HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

atilaneves

no profile record

コメント

atilaneves
·5 か月前·議論
> You don't need Emacs

Yes, I do.
atilaneves
·5 か月前·議論
> and lose access to most things

What "most things" are these?
atilaneves
·5 か月前·議論
No, you can just write D. It'll have the same performance as C, if you write C-like code. It might have better performance than C if you use templates (just like in C++).
atilaneves
·7 か月前·議論
Yes, that's my point. I'm replying to claims that "if it compiles it probably works". My limited experience with both is "nah".
atilaneves
·7 か月前·議論
Because it is also possible to write tests that don't adequately capture real-life requirements.

It was an MQTT server, and the tests basically went "if we have these subscriptions, then...", but no subscriptions ever got actually stored by the server.
atilaneves
·7 か月前·議論
Every language with a GC drastically reduces the chance of memory errors.
atilaneves
·7 か月前·議論
I hear this about both Haskell and Rust, and yet, when I tried both in the former I wrote a useless program because I didn't handle state (and yet passed all tests!) while in the latter I immediately wrote a deadlock.

So...yeah.
atilaneves
·7 か月前·議論
I made the same comment last week upon learning of a redis clone entirely vibe coded in IIRC ~70k lines of Rust. Why Rust? Why does a computer need a memory safe language?