HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

azulster

no profile record

コメント

azulster
·2 年前·議論
yes, you are missing that the tokens aren't words, they are 2-3 letter groups, or any number of arbitrary sizes depending on the model
azulster
·2 年前·議論
if you are worried about being able to afford the taxes on your assets then you just plain arent rich enough for it to apply to you, dont worry you are safe
azulster
·2 年前·議論
may be it shouldnt be the same as capital gains, but it should be related. like maybe it should be (capital gains tax rate - interest rate of loan) else it will simply be a way to continue to pay less taxes and still have your income as cash on hand
azulster
·2 年前·議論
why is everyone talking about small businesses when every proposal that's been published targets $100million + asset portfolios
azulster
·2 年前·議論
electron apps are an optimization all by itself.

it's not optimizing footprint or speed of application. it's optimizing the resources and speed of development and deployment
azulster
·2 年前·議論
not if it costs 200 million in man-hours to optimize
azulster
·2 年前·議論
it's literally just the oracle problem all over again
azulster
·2 年前·議論
so much effort is put into making terminals, aesthetic, customizable, and impressive. yet, not enough work is done in fixing the usability limitations of terminals (especially for casual users or beginners) such as: -command/argument discoverability, error forgiveness (being able to roll back a destructive command or detect and warn the user before executing), and general ergonomics
azulster
·2 年前·議論
its useful to measure and track the problem if only demonstrate it's validity
azulster
·2 年前·議論
messed around with the tool, why wouldnt a quilt of 4 squares evenly subdivide into 4 quilts of size 1? the tool shows it subdividing into 3 quilts of size 2 and 4 squares of size 1?

i could see 4 quilts of size 2 if "quilt size" is defined as length of side for the initial 4 is actually 4 on each side (16 squares)
azulster
·2 年前·議論
the word should probably be "optimize"
azulster
·2 年前·議論
if your frame of reference is centered on teh building then it could be claimed that the entire universe fundamentally depends on the exact properties of that building on some level
azulster
·2 年前·議論
probably because the dashes have semantic meaning
azulster
·2 年前·議論
USB solves this, but before USB every serial connection had to be programmed for individually, both for the OS and the firmware of the attachment.

we've solved it now with USB for peripherals, but we only just managed to solve the bandwidth problem for PCI, and we are still unable to attach RAM or CPUs via usb with any sort of performance
azulster
·2 年前·議論
my dream is to have a lamp-style imac with modern internals.

i wish apple would have fun with the chassis design again
azulster
·2 年前·議論
for such an influential design firm, i'm dissapointed in how uninteresting their website design is
azulster
·2 年前·議論
broad strokes yes, you are right.

however you missed some explanatory details:

!!!SPOILERS BELOW!!!

the trisolarans specifically evolved to survive their chaotic orbit, by being able to completely "dry out" and wait in stasis for a safer time. this is based on how some worms and bacteria on earth have the ability to survive extreme conditions by similar protective stasis methods.

the trisolarans are very intelligent but their advancements are constrained by the need to rebuild the civilization at unpredictable intervals. this actually drives their technological innovation as they are existentially motivated to figure out how to predict the orbital intervals.

its also implied that the trisolarans did not think themselves very far advanced compared to humans, only that they had a few centuries head start on understanding the fundamental nature of physics. they conclude that all they need to do is sabotage our particle colliders to confound our ability to gain any more insight into subatomic mechanics to prevent us from achieving what they have

moving their civilization across interstellar space is far less difficult than it would be for humans mostly because the civilizations can be dehydrated and kept in storage, not needing supplies to live out the years in transit. even so it still takes incredible engineering and resource investment to achieve because the fleet must move semi-autonomously and reliably for centuries because FTL travel is beyond their ability.

it would be impossible to stabilize their orbit because the planet is being chaotically thrown between 3 large stars. they are also not just concerend with surviving the next "hot cycle" they had predicted true apocalypse for even their survivable species. IIRC the planet was doomed to eventually fall into one of the stars based on their predictions
azulster
·2 年前·議論
yellowstone is literally called the first national park in the world so...yes?
azulster
·2 年前·議論
ironically i had the same feeling when i visited the vatican, and they were holding mass while i was visiting!

tourist attraction is always gonna feel like a tourist attraction i guess
azulster
·2 年前·議論
bricks and wood are unable to maximize the quality of a limited footprint. an expensive plot of land in a city needs to be built to certain quality standards to make sure it is affordable and safe. this is only possible with steel and concrete.

brick and wood alone can't build safely and cheaply over 3 stories