HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

baddash

306 カルマ登録 8 年前
[email protected]

投稿

Ask HN: Does anyone use Google's Jules?

1 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·9 日前·0 コメント

Subquadratic claims it broke through a bottleneck that's holding back LLMs

technologyreview.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·20 日前·2 コメント

Ask HN: How have you gotten burned by coding agents?

4 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·23 日前·1 コメント

Ask HN: How has mobile development changed for you?

2 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·24 日前·1 コメント

The Myth of 'Mad' Genius

aeon.co
4 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·25 日前·1 コメント

Ask HN: How long have you been looking for a job?

12 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·25 日前·6 コメント

Ask HN: What could happen if human beings become obsolete?

6 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·先月·5 コメント

Architectural Katas

architecturalkatas.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·2 か月前·0 コメント

I Gave My OpenClaw Agent a Physical Body

wired.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·2 か月前·1 コメント

Lessons from the Fairness of African Fractal Societies

aeon.co
6 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·2 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·3 か月前·0 コメント

Misanthropic

privatebank.jpmorgan.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·3 か月前·1 コメント

What is the real cost of betting on weather catastrophes?

aeon.co
2 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·3 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: How to Transition from SWE to ML Engineer

1 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·4 か月前·0 コメント

Quantum chip gives China's AI data centres '1k-fold' speed boost

scmp.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 baddash·8 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

baddash
·5 日前·議論
is it better than a Brother printer, cause i've had one for like a decade and it's the shit
baddash
·9 日前·議論
xD i think it's a cool tool though
baddash
·11 日前·議論
all the chicago ones are swimming out in lake michigan
baddash
·12 日前·議論
it's a huge oversimplification imo. it reminds me of someone worshipping LOC: more = better
baddash
·14 日前·議論
how much does your setup cost you? just curious
baddash
·17 日前·議論
title describes my life in a nutshell
baddash
·19 日前·議論
what do you think of it?
baddash
·19 日前·議論
i think claude is going to become the AI of the US government/public sector. if it isn't already
baddash
·24 日前·議論
perhaps it is time to resurrect Duckly queue Frankenstein music and thunder in background
baddash
·24 日前·議論
why are digital identities becoming more prominent?
baddash
·25 日前·議論
do you mind sharing the name of the company? I could use some help in the search too. my email is on my profile if you prefer that
baddash
·26 日前·議論
i haven't finished either, but once i do i can send you a message or something. my email is on my profile if you wanna exchange contact info
baddash
·26 日前·議論
i'm working on something similar, not a full agent harness but an agentic workflow app so i can learn too. if you're interested in sharing it would be awesome to take a look. i can share my project too!
baddash
·先月·議論
cool, sorry if i missed this but what initially inspired you to make alint?
baddash
·先月·議論
Look into Haier's RenDanHeYi philosophy. One of my ambitions is to adopt that model when I start a company, and I think it is awesome and the future.

BTW, seems like we think similarly regarding this. Wanna exchange contact info? my email is [email protected] if you're interested in connecting
baddash
·先月·議論
[flagged]
baddash
·先月·議論
Not from simply looking at the answer. From knowing the answer and reverse-engineering or understanding how to arrive at that answer in the first place. It's not always the best way of learning, but it definitely is a great way to learn if you care to actually understand why it is the answer and how you would have arrived at it.

> Your suggestion means we're no longer coddling/shielding students, but we also aren't actively helping them, are we?

My suggestion is just the former, it doesn't imply the latter.
baddash
·先月·議論
Even though it seems radical, I think the right approach is to simply allow the students to use AI to its full potential, to generate answers, code, whatever.

The onus should be on the instructor to make sure that the student ends up actually understanding and being able to code/solve problems that they pose without using coding agents.

Why? Because:

1. this is exactly what is going on in the real world. People are able to get AI to do whatever the hell they want, but the ones who just use it lazily end up with huge cognitive debts and codebases riddled with opaque bugs that they do not understand whatsoever. If we prevent students from confronting this temptation, then we are sort of coddling or shielding them from it, and not really preparing them to avoid pitfalls of this type.

2. you can actually learn a LOT by being given the answer, if you actually care to learn. i personally think it's pretty fucking lame to handicap a student's ability to learn in an attempt to prevent lazy abuse. isn't the whole point of a grade to measure how well you understand things? can't you have pop quizzes, assignments on a computer with no agent use, written tests, etc etc. to catch the lazy abusers? this is an unnecessary prevention of lazy abuse that unfairly handicaps learning
baddash
·先月·議論
I'm not talking about AI technology we use as the next generation of tooling. I am talking about new, possibly multiple intelligent species emerging which are superior to humanity.
baddash
·先月·議論
awesome thank you