HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

bbor

2,909 カルマ登録 4 年前
Self-unemployed R&D specializing in Unified AI approaches backed by philosophy. HMU -- always looking to collaborate, contract, or chat!

[email protected]

投稿

Plane Launch Week Gallery

plane.so
1 ポイント·投稿者 bbor·先月·1 コメント

Rise of the AI Soldiers

time.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 bbor·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

bbor
·一昨日·議論
I must apologize to my devoted followers on this program, but if the author can't bother to read the giant yellow warning at the top of the screen, I can't be bothered to finish the essay!
bbor
·一昨日·議論
That's extremely related to biology.
bbor
·3 日前·議論
Thank you, Anthropic. This random drop in the bucket wants you to know that this was a big deal for them!
bbor
·13 日前·議論
These are cameras sold specifically to be available over the open internet, I guess.
bbor
·16 日前·議論
Your logic is solid, but their usage kinda implies the opposite (that skylights would make summers worse, not winters). That seems possible given the obvious dynamics of increasing the amount of direct sunlight, but based on a quick Kagi the overall effect is actually good for both summer and winter if used instead of windows rather than in addition to windows:

  Introducing skylights allows the total fenestration area (windows plus skylights) to be reduced from a maximum 20% of floor area to as low as 12% of floor area while achieving the same baseline average daylight factor target of 5%, and reduces annual heating and cooling energy use and costs in all but two of the 108 models with skylights analyzed. In other words, when different combinations of skylights and windows are used to achieve the same target daylight factor, the heating and cooling energy cost savings are almost always greater when equivalent daylight comes from top‐lighting (skylights) rather than side‐lighting (windows).
https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/asset/documen...
bbor
·16 日前·議論
Heat is not a cost -- no one is physically cooking because they live within miles of a building with computers in it.

Water usage is not a cost with this new technology -- that is what the article is about.

Infrasound is terrifically understudied and should not be discussed definitively based on the findings of a highly-biased amateur, but regardless: fan sound is not a cost with this new technology -- that is what the article is about.

Re:pollution, I suppose all buildings are kinda inherently polluting just by existing. So you've got them on that point!

Most importantly, actually: the person above clearly knows about all this, and was just discussing the benefits on their own. I love me some pedantry (really!) but this attempt seems counterproductive, sorry.
bbor
·18 日前·議論
I’m kinda lost here… do y’all really have machines in your houses with hundreds of gigs of RAM?? Am I just behind the times?

The page advertises the 8-bit quant as taking ~800GB, which seems like it would require at least 3 consumer motherboards fully stacked w/ 4x64GB cards each.

Maybe “locally” has slowly come to imply “…on your homelab”?
bbor
·20 日前·議論
What exactly did AI steal? The concept of clocks?

AI is not involved in the actual copyrighted content at all.
bbor
·20 日前·議論
Correction: some random tiny scam company copied a book without permission in blatant violation of copyright law, and AI was briefly and tangentially involved with the final product.

In other words: AI stole someone’s soul with its own metallic claws! Out with the devil machines.
bbor
·21 日前·議論
For explicit comparison: kinetic and metamorphosis are ~10x as common as breviary, and 10,000x as common as hippo….

See NGRAMs: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Breviary%2CHip...
bbor
·21 日前·議論
Not to bring up the topic de jure too early, but this seems like a very lazy usage of AI. Especially egregious when it’s to redo something that’s been done a thousand times…
bbor
·21 日前·議論
The actual paper is linked above, and of course it’s bad. The gates are awesome ofc, but the paper’s philosophy is arrogant and uninformed (sorry Mr. Wynter!). And that’s what this is — including a video game example in your philosophy paper doesn’t make it a CS paper!

Basically it uses the cool gates alongside vacuous statements like this…

  Hence, the purported anthropomorphic attributes of LLMs are empirically non-unique: although some properties (e.g., responses to prompts) could remain invariant, others, such as the interpretation of their perceived behaviour, might change with the substrate.
…to disguise the underlying dogma, which serves as an unsupported conclusion: humans are assumed to be completely entirely unique in every way whatsoever, and any equations of parts of our wonderful ensouled meat sacks to parts of the wicked language machines must be supported by a proof that A != A.

Which, y’know… is a tough one!
bbor
·28 日前·議論
Which is the nearterm future that we must demand: a stop to the amounts of capital flowing to ASI research. Join me, Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI’s-founding-charter in saying the obvious, y’all; Pause AI, now.

It should be clear by now that there’s a whole universe of work to do with the models we have today, from studying to securing to ‘harness’ing. There are tons of economic benefits to be reaped already, if applied carefully. Doesn’t that sound nicer than rolling the dice with the lives of trillions?
bbor
·28 日前·議論
Wow, I’ve joked about the prospect so frequently that realizing it has a real Twitter subculture hit me hard. Describing people like that… it’s akin to derisively referring to “the dysfunctional” part of society, to pick on my own disability. The parallels to the Nazi’s ableism are pretty hard to ignore :(

But on a lighter note: is there any belief more certain to spoil?? My god. Don’t underestimate the moral worth of futureYou, folks. I guess delighting in their assured regret is a bit of a guilty pleasure, but it helps!

RE:RFK, I think you’re indeed overestimating their intentionality. They intuitively feel that measles wouldn’t affect them because they’re stronger, and would do their best to dance around that belief if pressed beyond their comfort zone of cherry-picked facts.

But really, they’d much prefer to just not think about that part altogether IMO; ‘MAHA’ is much more about hypernaturalism & tradwives than it is about public health. This is all just annoying scaffolding to them.
bbor
·28 日前·議論
They never claimed to be “so much ahead”, they just claimed to be honest.
bbor
·29 日前·議論
This is for the people who uber to work every day. Yes, they somehow exist. It blew my mind to meet one — he was spending something like $40/day on transport, as a new grad SWE!
bbor
·先月·議論
Very, very curious to see if HN's love of cute websites trumps our hatred of scroll capture (used here just as an initial hook).
bbor
·先月·議論
Out of curiosity, which AI persona should I attribute this writing to? Is this Claude?
bbor
·先月·議論
Yeah that title is absurd, tho it did make me read the whole thing out of pure incredulity. The “tearing itself apart” apparently refers to the fact that the CSU system spent $16M on AI tools during a $2B+ budget deficit, which… yeah. Doesn’t take an economics professor to see the problem with that thesis!

The author does seem interested in supporting the headline, but I think they're too good of a journalist to pull off the outrage. It mainly comes through in passages like this:

  After I pointed out to Janos that Marx himself would have had a field day with MarxGPT, he laughed… by interacting with ChatGPT, he and his students solidified its role in the public education ecosystem; and their ability to do so was the result of the transfer of almost $17 million of worker-generated public funds to a private, for-profit company. 
If this wasn’t the NYT, I’d assume this was a joke. Sadly, I think it is indeed intended as something of a slam dunk…

They do get to AI critics eventually, though obviously ‘activists dislike X’ isn’t really proof for ‘X is tearing us apart[, Lisa!]’. Namely,

  “We feel like a guinea pig for what A.I. is going to do to higher education,” Kenney said. The embrace of generative A.I., she went on, is “a step down the path of creating a really different kind of future citizen and worker.” This kind of student would be intellectually passive, less likely to see themselves as agents of their own lives.
I think everyone would agree they’re “guinea pigs”, as are we all in a way — such is the curse of living in interesting times. The rest seems pretty plainly speculative, though.

  This winter, the [critics at SFSU] circulated a petition asking the chancellor’s office to invest in protecting faculty jobs and academic programs rather than renew the OpenAI contract.
…hopefully an economics professor chimes in!
bbor
·先月·議論
You think they're intentionally being bad because they can't manage to pump $65B into a startup on a whim...?