HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

bcardarella

no profile record

投稿

Agentic Code Must Be Human Auditable

dockyard.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 bcardarella·先月·1 コメント

W3C Web Neural Net API Draft

w3.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 bcardarella·7 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

bcardarella
·先月·議論
I'm very glad to see the work, thank you for all of the efforts.
bcardarella
·先月·議論
I wonder how much this work being pushed forward right now is a response to the Bun drama.
bcardarella
·2 か月前·議論
Phantasy Star remains to this day my favorite RPG. I was the kid in the neighborhood who's parents bought a SEGA Master System instead of a NES. I would play Final Fantasy a bit over their houses but it always paled in comparison to Phantasy Star. I recently replayed it on Nintendo Switch. Still a very challenging RPG and stil feels great.
bcardarella
·7 か月前·議論
I agree that borrowing against unrealized gains is crap, it's lead to major economic divide. However, just make borrowing against unrealized gains illegal. Taxing unrealized gains is the wrong solution for a real problem.
bcardarella
·8 か月前·議論
"written in Rust"

ok
bcardarella
·8 か月前·議論
I only ran both with `cargo build --release`
bcardarella
·8 か月前·議論
Just a small comparison, compiled for release:

Boa: 23M Brimstone: 6.3M

I don't know if closing the gap on features with Boa and hardening for production use will also bloat the compilation size. Regardless, for passing 97% of the spec at this size is pretty impressive.
bcardarella
·8 か月前·議論
One that was tossed in 0.15 was `usingnamespace` which was a bit rough to refactor away from.
bcardarella
·10 か月前·議論
You may be correct, but the rate of change in baseball is glacially slow compared to the other sports. One of baseball's intrinsic values is it's legacy, tradition, and history. Some may scoff at that, and I think there are good arguments against legacy/tradition as a reason to withhold change, but there are a lot of people out there that believe this. The MLB Commissioner's have largely been tasked with protecting that tradition and history.
bcardarella
·10 か月前·議論
This is how CSS should be written. I will never understand why class names need to repeat the semantic purpose for a given element.
bcardarella
·3 年前·議論
It's never going to happen