HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

behnamoh

23,600 カルマ登録 10 年前

投稿

Tell HN: I'm not excited for Fable and am disappointed in Karpathy

7 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·9 日前·10 コメント

The warped space of M C Escher

michaelhogguk.wordpress.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·11 日前·0 コメント

Codex Fast mode isn't 50% faster, but still takes 2.5x usage

old.reddit.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·18 日前·3 コメント

8 Years of Refinement

alt-tab.app
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·26 日前·0 コメント

Local AI: 775 tok/s, DiffusionGemma (BF16) on Nvidia RTX 6000 Pro

twitter.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·29 日前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Why not compare Fable 5 with GPT "Pro"? Why compare with GPT xhigh?

1 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·29 日前·3 コメント

If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know

simonwillison.net
8 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·先月·2 コメント

Mythos/Fable intentionally hinders requests involving AI Research Development

twitter.com
14 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·先月·3 コメント

Anthropic_API_key? Anthropic will bill your API account instead of your Max plan

old.reddit.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·先月·2 コメント

Phind.com has shut down completely

old.reddit.com
12 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·2 か月前·0 コメント

Starlink is doubling standby price to $10/mo

teslanorth.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·2 か月前·1 コメント

M5 Max MacBook Pro Review: Preeminent Power in the Same Old Shell

gizmodo.com
10 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·4 か月前·13 コメント

One-liner to get Claude Code usage stats

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·0 コメント

Claude Code CLI burns ~1-3% of your quota on startup (even with NO prompts)

old.reddit.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·1 コメント

Excessive token usage in Claude Code

github.com
62 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·22 コメント

All iOS Ringtones from iOS 4 to iOS 26

onj3.andrelouis.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·0 コメント

Codex CLI might silently re-route your GPT-5.3 traffic to GPT-5.2 instead

twitter.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·0 コメント

Uncovering Claude Code's –Teleport Flag Revealed

blog.starbased.net
1 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·0 コメント

Claude Code bug forces users to restart chat, wasting tokens

old.reddit.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·2 コメント

Google follows Anthropic: Antigravity sub can't be used in OpenCode/etc.

old.reddit.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 behnamoh·5 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

behnamoh
·昨日·議論
> Codex is faster but you always have to correct it because it got something wrong

this has been my experience with Codex as well, and I have to fix its mistakes every single time. But recently, I literally threw away three hours of work because it kept adding hundreds of lines to my code base. When I restarted the entire work using Fable and Opus, it was like night and day.
behnamoh
·一昨日·議論
I'm curious, is this true or something you heard from MSM and regurgitated?
behnamoh
·一昨日·議論
choose one:

    brutally honest vs kindness at all costs
behnamoh
·一昨日·議論
Interesting, but how do they "combine" the results of all those parallel agents? How do they know which parts of each agent response is signal vs noise?
behnamoh
·3 日前·議論
how do you know gpt-5.5-pro is an ensemble? if it is, then how did OpenAI do it? why no other company has been able to pull it off?
behnamoh
·3 日前·議論
How? I'm pretty much locked into Claude Code and even if gpt models are good now, the experience with codex CLI has been so bad I won't go back to it.

e.g., it still doesn't have /revise or /undo!
behnamoh
·3 日前·議論
OpenAI already has a Mythos level model, it's called GPTCyber and before that, it was called gpt-5.5-pro.
behnamoh
·3 日前·議論
On macOS I've been using piper (https://github.com/OHF-Voice/piper1-gpl) to announce claude code notifications and it works perfectly!
behnamoh
·5 日前·議論
> Fable is the first model that mostly writes without the AI slop format for me

I'm not that impressed by Fable's writing to be honest, still has the AI giveaways like em dash.
behnamoh
·5 日前·議論
I still don't know why OpenAI doesn't put gpt-5.5-pro in Codex. It's one hell of a model and easily parallels Fable/Mythos. Sure, it'll use up your quota much faster but that's the price some users are willing to pay for absolutely high quality responses.

I think gpt-5.5-pro runs 12x parallel gpt-5.5 agents behind the scene and uses OpenAI's secret sauce to synthesize their answers into one insanely good response.
behnamoh
·12 日前·議論
Tokenmaxxing was never a thing to begin with. Just because a few companies did it doesn't mean it was a widespread phenomenon.
behnamoh
·12 日前·議論
What's wrong with Claude? I've asked it to analyze images and even Opus 4 would perfect nail it.
behnamoh
·15 日前·議論
Apple is very late to the AI party. By the time M7 is shipped, Nvidia will announce 6090 and people will be buying used (3|4|5)090 GPUs to run local models at much better performance than heat throttled M7.
behnamoh
·16 日前·議論
What else is new? Put it in emacs and let the model improve the harness over time.
behnamoh
·19 日前·議論
but they also burn more tokens per task, so in the end, Claude comes out as the more efficient one, despite giving you less tokens.
behnamoh
·19 日前·議論
Times like this remind me that despite GLM and Codex and other models being hyped up as Claude Opus 4.8 replacements, I still would not trust them with my most important work. For example, right now I'm working on a huge refactoring project, and even Opus has struggled with it after several days. I cannot even imagine how GLM, Codex, or other models would handle this. So the only option for me is to wait until this outage is over.

And it's not like open models are cheap to run even as alternatives. For example, with my $100/mo subscription for Claude Code, I often burn more than $100 a day several times a week. But if I were to use the API of GLM, it would be about $300.
behnamoh
·21 日前·議論
Is it sarcasm?

In any case, I think there are frauds in all ranks of universities. I've seen people in CMU steal someone else's research idea or even a whole paper and the university doesn't punish the professors who did this. It's the PhD students whose work and life gets destroyed by such things.
behnamoh
·24 日前·議論
Don't use OpenRouter, the company is a shitty middle man. Use DeepSeek API directly.
behnamoh
·29 日前·議論
no, there's a "pro" model you can only access on the web.
behnamoh
·29 日前·議論
I think your comment refers to @Someone1234.