HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

benchmarkist

no profile record

投稿

Data Processing Inequality and Unsurprising Implications (2018)

chrischoy.github.io
1 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

[untitled]

4 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

How close is AI to human-level intelligence?

nature.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·4 コメント

Foundations of Algorithmic Thermodynamics (2023)

arxiv.org
4 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

GCC Compiler vs. Human – 119x Faster Assembly (2023)

ashvardanian.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Information Theory: Obstacles to True Artificial Intelligence (2016)

blog.paulbohm.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Significant amount of methane escaping East Siberian Arctic Shelf (2013)

phys.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Beating GPT-4 with open source

blog.dottxt.co
5 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on AI governance, ethics, and innovation [video]

youtube.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Evaluating the Robustness of Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Llama 3.1 405B now runs at 969 tokens/s on Cerebras Inference

cerebras.ai
427 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·156 コメント

Modeling urban growth shows that cities develop in ways similar to tumors

phys.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Compilers for Free (2013)

tomstu.art
2 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

The case for reducing existential risks (2017)

80000hours.org
4 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Existential Risk: Threats to Humanity's Future

existential-risk.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Automatic Differentiation in Ruby (2016)

tomstu.art
3 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·0 コメント

Earth Could Be Alien to Humans by 2500 (2021)

scientificamerican.com
28 ポイント·投稿者 benchmarkist·2 年前·25 コメント

コメント

benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
[flagged]
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
[dead]
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
I don't eat meat and don't drive cars. How about you?
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
The universe does not have a finite symbolic description. Whatever meaning you attribute to the symbols has no objective reality beyond how people interpret those symbols. Same is true for the arithmetic performed by neural networks to flash lights on the screen which people interpret as meaningful messages.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
How about we leave the silk worms alone.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
Humans currently produce industrial poisons on an unimaginable scale so you're not far off.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
Yet another instance of how people view the biosphere as a resource to be exploited for their own monetary profit and short-term benefit. That type of logic and thinking is a dead end. I've never had a silk robe and I doubt I would be any better off if I did have one. I'd much prefer clean air, water, and unpoisoned land for growing nutritious food.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
The function/mathematics in an NN (neural network) is meaningless unless there is an outside observer to attribute meaning to it. There is no such thing as a meaningful mathematical expression without a conscious observer to give it meaning. Fundamentally there is no objective difference between one instance of a NN with one parameter, f(θ), evaluated on some input, f(θ)(x), and another instance of the same network with a small perturbation of the parameter, f(θ+ε), evaluated on the same input, f(θ+ε)(x), unless a conscious observer perceives the output and attributes meaning to the differences because the arithmetic operations performed by the network are the same in both networks in terms of their objective complexity and energy utilization.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
It's a good essay but you didn't address my point.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
How does math encode meaning if there is no Alice and Bob? You should quickly realize the absurdity of your argument once you take people out of the equation.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
Here you go: https://g.co/gemini/share/852449bad133
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
And how do they do that? Be very specific.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
I don't think there is any real value in making videos other than useless entertainment. The real inspired use of computation and AI is to cure cancer, that would be the right way to show the world that this technology is worthwhile and useful. The techniques involved would be the same because one would need to include real physical constraints like conservation of mass and energy instead of figuring out the best way to flash lights on the screen with no regard for any foundational physical principles.

Do you know anyone or any companies working on that?
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
I guess we'll never know.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
I'd be embarrassed if I was a physicists and my name was associated with software that had phantom masses appearing and disappearing into the void.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
My price is very cheap in terms of what it would enable and allow OpenAI to charge their customers. Hamiltonian video generation with conservation principles which do not have phantom masses appearing and disappearing out of nowhere is a billion dollar industry so my asking price is basically giving away the entire industry for free.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
Unless you have $500k to pay for the actual implementation of a Hamiltonian video generator then I don't think you're in a position to tell me what I know and don't know.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
Ok, have a good one dude.
benchmarkist
·2 年前·議論
[flagged]