HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

blef

no profile record

投稿

Build agent-powered apps without reinventing the shell

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 blef·先月·0 コメント

Codex MSN Interface

codexmessenger.net
1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·3 か月前·0 コメント

React library to add mentions in textarea

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 blef·4 か月前·2 コメント

ISON Format

ison.dev
2 ポイント·投稿者 blef·4 か月前·0 コメント

Nimble gets $75M to build web datasets for AI agents

twitter.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 blef·5 か月前·0 コメント

Data teams should become context teams

thenewaiorder.substack.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 blef·5 か月前·0 コメント

Comparison of 14 data analytics agents

thenewaiorder.substack.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·6 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·9 か月前·0 コメント

Dbt Labs open source MetricFlow

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·9 か月前·0 コメント

DuckDB extension caching remote files on local blocks

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 blef·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·9 か月前·0 コメント

Claude Code but for Analytics

getmacro.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 blef·10 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

blef
·3 か月前·議論
I am building nao, an open-source analytics agent. With nao you can connect all your sources of context (from warehouse to your knowledge base) using a CLI, and then you have an agent that sits on top of it.

You can use the agent from any client (web, Slack, Teams but also other harnesses).

We think most of data analytics work will be transformed (and is already being transformed) from SQL monkeys to chat to analyses, but all the UI/UX are not designed for this and this is what nao is, being open-source because knowing how the context is managed is key.

With nao you can have a conversation and then shared the output on the form of a story, that can be either static or live replacing what old dashboards were.

We are close to 1k stars on Github: https://github.com/getnao/nao
blef
·3 か月前·議論
I really like the YouTube app to be honest and I really dislike the web version, so to me it does not work.
blef
·4 か月前·議論
Reminds me https://www.agentsview.io/.
blef
·4 か月前·議論
Ironic to see how popular this post is when you see the amount of generated AI companies are at YC (here I also take the blame).

Nonetheless I like this policy as well.
blef
·4 か月前·議論
Thank you! I have to put the Storyboard online and a few screen of what you can do with it
blef
·4 か月前·議論
I'm working most of my time on nao [1] (an open-source analytics agent).

With nao we are exploring the fact that agents are good to work with filesystems, so we help people getting the context into the filesystem and then you can plug our agent loop on top (on anything else).

The most exciting part is working with sandboxes and emulating filesystems. So at the moment the filesystem is local, but it could be a bucket or a database that we emulate as real filesystem for the agentic loop, all of this can also be mounted to sandboxes, and in the end you can do data transformations all in isolation with control on the context.

[1] https://github.com/getnao/nao
blef
·5 か月前·議論
I feel it's a bit weird to redirect "Get started" to a Stripe page. When clicking on Get started i'd love to see more what's behind like it's used to be.

Nonetheless i like the idea.
blef
·5 か月前·議論
Not sure about the naming, wouldn't something with Mistral naming better to understand what it is? Like Mistral Code or Mistral CLI or Clistral (lol)
blef
·5 か月前·議論
The title would have been event better if: "I had ChatGPT analyze a decade of my Apple Watch data, then it called my doctor"
blef
·8 か月前·議論
Supporting Iceberg is eventually having people leaving you because they have better elsewhere, but this is birectionnal, it means you can welcome people from Databricks because you have feature parity.
blef
·9 か月前·議論
Feels old when you see how it played out to become SQL for everything in the data ecosystem lately.

Even though SQL as flaws, maybe a lot, it has one upside which is: it's so easy to onboard people on it, in the data ecosystem (warehousing etc.) it means that we can do way much stuff faster than before and hire less technical people, which is great
blef
·9 か月前·議論
sad it's paywalled, but the title is interesting
blef
·9 か月前·議論
I'm curious to see how you successfully got working well the types as I'm lost in the nightmare for a few days.
blef
·9 か月前·議論
What could go wrong.
blef
·9 か月前·議論
“888” is eight hours each of work, sleep and recreation, which is a great thing.

The ironic part of it is that most of the people doing 996 are building AI to replace humans work. And this is something that we don't talk about when speaking about 996. It's only a privilege, a lot of people would love to have normal job or a 996.

I come from Europe, I've had my high and lows when it comes to work hours, I was a consultant worked a lot, then a freelance and worked 2 day a week, now startup founder (YC) I don't count my hours but I'm close to working 6 days a week. To be honest the 4 years I worked 2 days a week were awesome and I'd wish everyone to reach that state where work is not the most important thing you do each week.
blef
·9 か月前·議論
Except Databricks or Snowflake I have trouble seeing who in the data space would like to buy them. They are small among the big data companies ($1B rev)
blef
·9 か月前·議論
And to save a click to people: "The React Foundation will be part of the Linux Foundation, which has long fostered a vendor-neutral environment for open source projects"
blef
·9 か月前·議論
This is interesting. Funnily enough this is something that we also built in the tool I'm building called nao, which is a data editor for data teams. Because most of the SQL parsers aren't fault tolerant we had to develop our own fault-tolerant parser.

I really think what you showcase in the start of the article is the best thing, being able to statically highlight error in a text form for a user (or for a LLM) to iterate on the fixes is the best thing.
blef
·9 か月前·議論
I'm one of the biggest fan of the Django ORM and I wish it would have won the battle over alembic/sqlalchemy that I dislike
blef
·9 か月前·議論
paywall