HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

bluediscussy22

no profile record

コメント

bluediscussy22
·5 年前·議論
Right that's correct. It shows SKU usage but not mapped to actual instance id. And we have the scenario you are talking about - lots of same sku with variable cost and no way to correlate it without using bigquery it seems
bluediscussy22
·5 年前·議論
Here's the link to the actual cost for viewing my billing data. https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/export-data-big...

We really should revolt against this. I should be able to have a view of all of my billing without having to pay extra. It also shouldn't be hidden behind a bigquery export, it should be easy view what is being spent and what is causing it.
bluediscussy22
·5 年前·議論
It's funny this is coming up now. Just yesterday in GCP I was trying to figure out our billing and looking at what was costing such a huge amount. I couldn't figure out any way to map the actual service being used to the price on the normal reporting or even on the billing cost table export. The only way I could figure out how to do it was to enable log export. They used to have an option to download that as a file. They disabled that a while ago and now it's only available as a bigquery export. Which is exported every day. I was like "Why would that they do that ?" Oh cause now I have to set up big query and pay for all that. So I have to pay extra JUST TO SEE my detailed billing information. Pretty ridiculous.