HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

borski

7,319 カルマ登録 18 年前
Just a hacker in the SF bay area who likes technology of all sorts; cyber security expert, founder, angel, advisor/mentor, and singer/musician. :)

Working on https://www.kobofoundry.com

I have always been more interested in why and how things worked, rather than just being content that they did.

20+ years in offensive software security, eight patents (I hate them but tell that to the VCs who love them)

Sold Tinfoil Security, after 9 years of building it, to Synopsys, in January 2020. Hell of a ride.

My (last) startup: https://www.tinfoilsecurity.com acquired by https://www.synopsys.com

Twitter: @borski

[email protected] -- get in touch! I'm always up for meeting interesting people.

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/borski; my proof: https://keybase.io/borski/sigs/-cfyFmMrqV_tAh69m5bO-EY3t_gllRR0ODZqOa7E0E4 ]

投稿

Elizabeth Warren Asks the SEC to Delay the SpaceX IPO

businessinsider.com
11 ポイント·投稿者 borski·先月·0 コメント

No special treatment for SpaceX in the S&P 500 [pdf]

spglobal.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 borski·先月·0 コメント

Toxic chemical leak at a manufacturing facility in Orange County

bbc.com
170 ポイント·投稿者 borski·2 か月前·158 コメント

The IT department: Where AI goes to die

economist.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 borski·3 か月前·0 コメント

OpenCode Limits Sidebar Plugin

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 borski·3 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Travel Hacking Toolkit – Points search and trip planning with AI

github.com
95 ポイント·投稿者 borski·3 か月前·41 コメント

Pentagon sets Friday deadline for Anthropic to abandon ethics rules for AI

politico.com
35 ポイント·投稿者 borski·5 か月前·7 コメント

コメント

borski
·5 日前·議論
Given that most dogs are adopted from shelters, dog behavior is often a reflection of early upbringing. The current owner can train and teach their dog, but some behaviors and fears set in fairly early on.

Moreover, many dogs are beaten or worse when they’re young, and undoing that fear and trauma is a lifelong (for the dog) struggle.

Thus, dog behavior is far from “strictly a reflection of their [current] owner.”
borski
·6 日前·議論
This is just untrue.
borski
·7 日前·議論
Do you have anything to indicate this? A source or any analysis?
borski
·7 日前·議論
They often have promotions which can make this very lucrative. “spend at least 1 mile, get 40% off” etc
borski
·7 日前·議論
I’m familiar with the margins in retail (my parents ran a retail store their entire lives).

My point wasn’t that they don’t do a lot of volume; it’s that their retail business is not what’s driving their profit, and I don’t believe it’s growing.

I wouldn’t be surprised (though have not looked) if DoorDash (with DashMart), Uber Eats (which does more than just food), and Instacart have eaten significantly into Amazon’s revenue by solving the “get it to me” problem even faster.
borski
·7 日前·議論
True, but at higher prices (and with delivery fees), which somewhat defeats the purpose of the cost savings at Costco.
borski
·7 日前·議論
In Q1 2026, AWS was 60% (roughly) of Amazon’s operating income.

I’m not so sure their retail piece is the part that’s making them big money.
borski
·27 日前·議論
Well, there you go, he said it: https://x.com/petehegseth/status/2065897156226015690?s=46&t=...
borski
·27 日前·議論
David Sacks could not be further from a reliable or impartial narrator on this topic.

And before someone calls this an ad hominem, it isn’t; I am not saying he is bad or morally wrong or anything else (you are free to think that or not, as am I).

But Sacks has skin in the game. And that makes him both unreliable and partial.
borski
·27 日前·議論
I put sunscreen on my hands.
borski
·28 日前·議論
Yes, and if you’re driving late at night near a college campus I’d recommend slowing down and being extra careful.

College kids are allowed to get drunk and act stupid.

You are still not allowed to hit them.
borski
·28 日前·議論
Out of how many pedestrian-vehicle collisions?

Anyway, I am not saying it never happens.
borski
·28 日前·議論
I agree, of course. That is far from the most common scenario.

In the most common scenario, it is the driver’s fault.

Of course there are exceptions to everything.
borski
·29 日前·議論
It is either a YC company or the poster was (or is) a YC founder.
borski
·29 日前·議論
I agree.
borski
·29 日前·議論
If you walk around yielding a knife, and you accidentally walk into someone who wasn’t paying attention, it is definitely your fault.

If you drive a car and accidentally drive into someone who isn’t paying attention, that is also on you.

You are holding the bigger weapon. That means you have the higher requirement for safety, imho.

I track cars and race, fwiw, so it’s not like I don’t like cars.
borski
·29 日前·議論
The pedestrian is not the one driving the weapon. It is your fault if you hit a pedestrian, even if they walk right off the curb, even if they’re drunk.

Unless they intentionally jump in front of your car in an attempt to commit suicide, it is always on you to ensure you can stop and respond to an emergency, and a pedestrian is such a thing, imho.
borski
·30 日前·議論
> I'm doing no such thing. By invalidating the Monet piece if it is described as AI-generated, art becomes entirely about the creation story. So that moves the bar to telling a convincing story.

No. Art isn’t about the “origin story,” but about what it makes you feel. In part, what it makes you feel is due to the fact that it was made by a human, with human emotion and intent, to communicate an idea to the world. AI has no such emotional backing.

> And LLMs can absolutely do that at the level of those museum placards next to each painting. So if you add an actor to pose as the artist, the art is the performance now.

Museum placards are not what make art interesting.

> But I no longer believe people care about empathy. The US wouldn't have elected a grifting performance artist president twice if they valued empathy.

Irrelevant; two things can be true at once. Also, not everyone has empathy, and not everyone likes art.

That’s why most people don’t have art on their walls, but random prints from IKEA.

> We're much more hindbrain-driven than I suspect you think we are.

Many people are! But “people who like art” is a relatively small subset of people, and I maintain that nearly everyone who likes art likes it because it makes them feel something.

Otherwise, there would be no difference between a Picasso and a print from EBay.

People who like art don’t buy NFTs. They buy art made by humans.
borski
·30 日前·議論
https://archive.is/I4K0L
borski
·30 日前·議論
You misunderstand art. If art were solely about the outcome, we’d all be staring at photographs instead, as no art will ever have as high fidelity.

Art is about the journey of the artist; the meaning with which that art is impregnated is the point. What you cynically refer to as “human-level BS,” others refer to as “the human condition” because we can relate to other humans, and empathy is a thing.

It’s okay not to like art. But pretending art is just “the painting at the end” is nonsense.