HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

breadsniffer

no profile record

投稿

Show HN: Simulation of the Tech Industry in 2027

marbleos.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 breadsniffer·9 か月前·9 コメント

OpenAI's H1 2025: $4.3B in income, $13.5B in loss

techinasia.com
558 ポイント·投稿者 breadsniffer·9 か月前·697 コメント

コメント

breadsniffer
·8 日前·議論
Why do I feel like this is the story of the average B2B SaaS YC startup?
breadsniffer
·11 日前·議論
I’m paying $100 per month for codex, idk if that’s them “losing”….? Although idk about big enterprise cos keeping their unlimited token/tokenmaxxin usage though API req
breadsniffer
·先月·議論
Turn this into an essay or something, cool ideas here
breadsniffer
·先月·議論
+1
breadsniffer
·2 か月前·議論
They’re so disconnected from reality, living in their own bubble.
breadsniffer
·2 か月前·議論
gottem!!! Bad bot
breadsniffer
·2 か月前·議論
from perplexity deep research: "Colossus‑related gas‑turbine power plants have been run in ways alleged to violate the Clean Air Act, in already over‑polluted Black and low‑income communities near Memphis, and Anthropic has now become the main user of that infrastructure."

sources: https://www.tba.org/?pg=Hastings2025AIX (Tech, Toxins, and Memphis: Evaluating the Environmental Footprint of the xAI Facility)
breadsniffer
·3 か月前·議論
Yeah very simple, but cool nonetheless.
breadsniffer
·4 か月前·議論
Mamboooo no. #5
breadsniffer
·4 か月前·議論
Anyone know what kind of departments/parts of business were the first adopters of visicalc?
breadsniffer
·4 か月前·議論
Facts
breadsniffer
·7 か月前·議論
can you expand on your workflow?
breadsniffer
·9 か月前·議論
2027
breadsniffer
·9 か月前·議論
I took inspiration from (https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/osec/osec20250812), which mentions: "Demand-Driven Strategies: Expand proven work-based learning models like Registered Apprenticeships and align education programs to career pathways in priority industries to ensure direct connections to employer needs."

I was surprised to find this coming from the current admin for sure...
breadsniffer
·9 か月前·議論
Thank you for the kind words!
breadsniffer
·2 年前·議論
There's still the cost of reviewing bad code. If the task was "completed" but you have to spend 20 mins looking over the code or the whole 1-hour-long process to "understand" what it did, it still failed.