I think it's time that AWS customers hesitate before using any abstract software that AWS has built, as we're about to see the enshittification/profitability squeeze of an incumbent player. I wouldn't trust anything more than the ec2, RDS, S3 layer which are more "completed" products and there's not much to enshitify, only squeeze costs. You can already see that AWS has essentially dropped support of any publicly available software, I can't imagine it's any different internally.
It seems like AWS is replicating GCP's level of customer support, instead of using that as a differentiator (not that AWS' support was ever great, but dang it sure was better than GCP's by comparison). Consider yourself on the own, only trust software built on VM's, not SaaS abandonware.
I'm convinced nothing solid has come out of AWS in 10 years. The original products (ec2, RDS, s3) are solid either from being created at a time when AWS could write software or just from existing for so long.
Any modern AWS product (mostly SaaS) is just utter dookie, the only reason they continue to sell well is companies already have an accounting relationship with AWS. It's a lot less internal approvals required to start using the AWS SaaS version of whatever, compared to a brand new vendor negotiation contract and security guarantees.
So I guess AWS is just working off of a broken incentive structure designed to churn out SaaS-slop over stuff that actually works great.
I'm more familiar with kubernetes for running production-grade apps and that's what I went with. I run ubuntu's microk8s, and the volume management is in kubernetes-land which I understand well. Finally helmfiles deploys my Postgres and immich helm charts. Perhaps "overkill" to some, but it's tooling I'm very familiar with, and feel comfortable running in "production" for my personal server.
Worth noting that immich itself recommends not using immich for the single source of your images and videos from how active development it is, so I also run nextcloud + crunchydata's postgres also inside microk8s/kubernetes.
It seems like AWS is replicating GCP's level of customer support, instead of using that as a differentiator (not that AWS' support was ever great, but dang it sure was better than GCP's by comparison). Consider yourself on the own, only trust software built on VM's, not SaaS abandonware.