HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

bstrama

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·18 日前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·18 日前·0 コメント

Show HN: Wattfare – LLM API that's paid by users, not dev

wattfare.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·25 日前·0 コメント

Show HN: Hallucinopedia

halupedia.com
317 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·2 か月前·267 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·3 か月前·0 コメント

CodeSandbox: Deprecation Notice

4 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·3 コメント

YC: Need more time to review application

6 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·13 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·0 コメント

If AI is great at HTML/CSS, why are AI presentation/CV tools template based?

1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·1 コメント

Why local AI tool execution is an anti-pattern

gace.dev
5 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·6 コメント

Show HN: Gace AI – A zero-config platform to build and host AI plugins for free

gace.dev
2 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·4 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: Isolating AI-generated code from human code | Vibe as a Code

npmjs.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 bstrama·5 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

bstrama
·18 日前·議論
Foundation labs use bundled subscriptions to pool inference costs across dozens of tools. Startup founders don't have such advantage.

As the result, we see a lot of product behind 200/mo paywall. Conversion rates are low, free tiers cost builders a lot and Anthropic kills competition at scale.

Please, share your thoughts on that
bstrama
·24 日前·議論
Could you share GitHub? Also image background remover doesn't seem to work on my PC (macOS 26.5.1, chrome 149.0.7827.103)
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Agreed. If you have some time, you can find our GitHub on halupedia.com. All PRs welcomed! ;)
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Nice! I'm thinking on how can I make it more interactive. Those author styles could work well, will check that out.

Btw how would you imagine such dispute? What do you think could be the trigger for the article to be regenerated?
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Could be interesting direction to discover. The only problem with such implementation is it could take some work to make it cheap and actually well working. And I'm just thinking about the near future of this project.

I really like it, but without organic traffic, at the position we're right now, the moment HN stops showing us at the top, we will loose all the visitor.

And it's not like I'm trying to do a startup out of it. I just very enjoy making something people love! It's first time in my life and it's amazing.

If you have any interesting thought, please leave them here - I'll definitely read it, or visit our discord [link on halupedia ;) ].
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
there's now a search bar btw
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
UPDATE: Search bar
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
What? ~ Joe B.
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
UPDATE: Added moderation
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
It is instructed to reference A LOT of articles. It just hallucinates all the url. If the url points to already existing article - it's just a coincidence

Here's our source code: https://github.com/BaderBC/halupedia
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Used to be a problem - now consistent for new articles ;)
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
If you have idea how to improve it, I'm all ears ;)
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Interesting idea with flagging. We are considering 2 options: 1. You can generate aricle only if it was previously referenced in previous one 2. Flagging mechanism, now that you brought it up.

Let me know what you think!
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Actually interesting response. You can also check out github.
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
I were just drunk and idea seemed funny. That's the idea behind haha.

But either way can't wait to see google ai overview cite us.
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Update: Implemented it. All new articles work that way
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Best part - I didn't implement such logic. It just for some reason works that way.
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Also now that I think, we store articles in decwntralized cloudflare KV store and access from serverless workers running also on their servers.

That could be the thing behind it being so quick.

Cloudflare workers have 1ms cold start.
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
Just added comment section :)
bstrama
·2 か月前·議論
UPDATE: Just now, comment section added. Have a nice time arguing!