HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

bvsrinivasan

no profile record

投稿

The Emerging Science of ML Benchmarks

mlbenchmarks.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·5 か月前·0 コメント

Extending the Attention Mechanism in Transformers to Continuum operators

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·2 年前·0 コメント

Can an AI Make Plans?

newyorker.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·2 年前·1 コメント

So you wanna get unstuck

experimental-history.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·3 年前·0 コメント

Learning needs to be effortful to be effective

giansegato.com
375 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·3 年前·149 コメント

Advanced Monty Hall? The Sleeping Beauty Problem

en.wikipedia.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·3 年前·0 コメント

Achieving Tech Independence

sive.rs
12 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·3 年前·4 コメント

The first foundation model for Weather and Climate

microsoft.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·3 年前·2 コメント

Representing means what you think

yohanjohn.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 bvsrinivasan·4 年前·0 コメント

コメント

bvsrinivasan
·2 年前·議論
https://archive.is/sdLzz
bvsrinivasan
·3 年前·議論
I'm not sure if someone has already posted this here, but Cal Newport had a nice presentation summarizing what we know about the effects of social media usage on children.

https://youtu.be/VN5lrKMeAOs

I showed this to my teenaged daughter and while she was irritated, she reluctantly agreed that it made sense.
bvsrinivasan
·3 年前·議論
Nice list of steps to take to become independent of big tech providers
bvsrinivasan
·3 年前·議論
Thanks! I didn't read the data in the pictures, only read the text. Time for GPT4 I guess :-D

As you said, this also looks wrong. Maybe double-counting? Same people or IDs getting leaked across multiple platforms?
bvsrinivasan
·3 年前·議論
The net number (669 million) looks wrong. India's population is around 1.4 billion, so this would mean a data leak of nearly 1 in 2 Indians. If we further remove children below 14 (30% of India) who are unlikely to have data of their own and others who are completely off any of the data leak sources, the number given here would mean everyone in India has had their data leaked!

The data distribution given in the article seems to add to approximately 7 crores (70 million). I think there is a misplaced decimal somewhere. In all probability it is 6.69 crores (66.9 million). Still very significant, though.