HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

cakeday

no profile record

コメント

cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
What the fuck does that matter? And no, it wasn't made today.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
We all grow old. Your situation today may not be the same as tomorrow and you may find your smug self needing social security.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
So many far left conspiracy theories in here, blatant false accusations, assertions and wild fallacies.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
IIRC, last presidential election that was what we did in our county, voted on a machine, got a prinout, verified it, stuck it in the scanner and was done. I think I'm remembering it right?
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
Interesting notion, I'd never come across that before. I've seen many demos of what the Earth could look like with all the ice melted but I'm not sure any of them took what you're describing into account.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
> This is where I will disagree and stand fast.

You're welcome to do that but you're wrong as far as the majority of selfhosters are concerned. Spend time on https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/ for more information about how widely people define it.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
That's actually not correct at all.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
> In my opinion, if your services had downtime today, you are not “self-hosting”.

Zero here.

> If you depend on anything which has “cloud” in its name, you are not “self-hosting”.

Minor dependency on OCI but no down time at all for any services I run.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
> Host in house?

Yes, mostly.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
That's informative, I wasn't aware of that way to view HN, thanks.
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
"authoritarian regimes"

It seems someone at F-Droid may have a political axe to grind with the current US presidency and the majority of the population of America who elected (1.)them.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidentia...
cakeday
·9 か月前·議論
The US Constitution's First Amendment protects religion from government. There is no amendment protecting porn or gratuitous violence. Marking the religious apps as NSFW may be a violation of the First Amendment and could potentially be challenged in court, to a potentially huge sum of money and F-Droid's potential detriment.