That's some high level expert coffee talk! And it's always fun if they try to outsmart eachother. Are they accurate in your opinion? I know literally nothing about obscure types of coffee :-)
Thanks! And thank god my tool passed the 'what year is it' test you tried haha.
I tried Opper now you sent it, and they're both similar AI roundtable tools indeed, but my main goal for Rauno was that the user actually sees what every model says, in real-time. To see every perspective of every AI model, so it actually becomes a lively discussion. But opper definitely has some great points too!
You're right. Maybe I should have said 'painting or songs that do not SEEM outstanding in itself". My point is that an AI 'rehydrating' human context that you mentioned, is (usually) not enough to get the same significance as human-made art.
Yeah I agree, in art a lot is driven by context: there's so many paintings or songs that are not outstanding in itself, but the full human context around it makes it significant.
Another sign that the context and the human factor will always play a huge role in how we experience art. For example, AI generated music can sound perfect, but still we value it less if we don't know anything about the musician's life.