HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

catoc

640 カルマ登録 10 年前

コメント

catoc
·3 日前·議論
Haha, nice. TIL.

So all we need is ‘controlled prompting’ to handle prompt injections :-)
catoc
·3 日前·議論
Exactly!

Attempting to handle prompt injections by prompting the model (not to leak sensitive data), is like attempting to stop a fire by burning the area around it
catoc
·3 日前·議論
And then the secretary shared the conversation with 260 ‘partners’ and added everything you said to an LLM training corpus…

So, NO, this is not “what secretaries were”
catoc
·12 日前·議論
Agreed. And even etymology agrees:

Plagiarize comes from plagiarius, latin for ‘kidnapper’.

You cannot kidnap yourself
catoc
·18 日前·議論
Yeah, the headline changed while I wrote my comment
catoc
·18 日前·議論
Age Verification is not about “saving kids from spying/social media”.

Same as Regulatory Encryption Backdoors are not about “protecting kids from child predators”

This is framing. Abusing kids is bad. But that is not what this about. Let’s keep the discussion on topic: the goal is 1984-level oversight… not just of the kids

[Edit: I guess HN agrees: meanwhile the title changed from “saving kids from spying” to “is actually mass-surveillance” - good]
catoc
·20 日前·議論
Which shares your personal data with over 200 “partners”… thanks, but no
catoc
·先月·議論
https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
So then you need to know distance / roundtrip-length within centimeter precision as well (below 29.98 cm for sub-nanosecond precision… to be precise).

Since cm precision is often not possible, is roundtrip-length an estimated average from prior roundtrips?
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
Then, since it’s about publishing (emails), they should have picked

e-mprimatur

(⌐⊙_⊙)
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
That… is true - thanks for editing your comment to clarify

The initial thread read like “.com domains are exclusive to US” which they of course aren’t
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
It is not

Source: own multiple, via EU registrar

(Edit: Parent was edited after reply - parent statement is now correct)
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
https://archive.ph/44z6b
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
“Security through obscurity” has the connotation that it is the obscurity that achieves the security - which is bad.

”Security including obscurity“ is fine.
catoc
·2 か月前·議論
Would you have any more info? I have both: adobe synctool + issues with smb shares
catoc
·3 か月前·議論
Fair.

And I my point was I really like the site!

I promise to become lessvocal about the ads.
catoc
·3 か月前·議論
Such a great personal project!

These kind of things is what the ‘www’ was created for - good vibes!

Why riddle it with ads?
catoc
·3 か月前·議論
I know, always hard to tell on HN. Added the relevant declarative tag
catoc
·3 か月前·議論
> Are you sure it's a DDoS and not just a DoS?

I think these days it’s ‘DAIS’, as in your site just DAIS - from Distributed/Damned AI Scraping
catoc
·3 か月前·議論
It’s only bad if you’re a closed, for-profit entity

</sarcasm>