cerved · HackerTrans

ofc if you're running AI agents in YOLO mode — clones means you don't need to worry that Sonnet is going to see your .git/index.lock file and go "this is blocking me, let's rm -f this" and corrupt all your work that you never bothered pushing

cerved

先月議論

Worktrees effectively share the entire state of the repo. Only limitation is that a branch can only be checked out in one repo at a time.

Clones only share the immutable object store

For most practical uses of same repo checking out different branches locally, worktrees are better.

The nice thing about clones is that you can have a backup clone, a wip clone, a review clone where you don't clutter the amount of local branch refs

cerved

先月議論

Doesn't work. You need to mount both the worktree and the repo which defeats the point

cerved

先月議論

you can also setup a local remote which hardlinks the index so it doesn't occupy more space. Why? Idk. You don't want to share stash, rerere-cache, branches whatever.

Also handy if you're running an agent in a container on the local fs. Set up a local clone, contain the agent to that repo folder and have it hack away on that. Later, you step out of the container and do the syncing. You can't use worktrees in this situations.

Bare repos are also pretty cool. You can clone the git mailing list as a bare repo and search for threads there instead of setting up an mbox (same for the kernel obviously)

cerved

2 か月前議論

Fwiw you can create your own trailers

    Yolo-Slopped-By: Sonnet-4.5 <[email protected]>

https://git-scm.com/docs/git-interpret-trailers

cerved

2 か月前議論

if you want to reason about language correctness you are better off using linters, compilers and things like fuzzing

> the trend is AI also does the code review

please no. Keep at least four eyes on all code you ship

cerved

2 か月前議論

Anthropic obviously vibe code everything and it shows

cerved

3 か月前議論

You use gh to interact with the forge, git to interact with the repo.

For example

  gh pr checks --watch

will run and poll the CI checks of a PR and exit 0 once they all pass

cerved

3 か月前議論

> Starlink Consumer Broadband at $380B (9.2M subscribers, ~38x revenue)

I mean that Starlinks consumer broadband is valued at ~38x revenue, when other telcos are valued around 1.5x revenue. That revenue is 2533% more expensive, why pay such a big premium for something that's essentially the same?

cerved

3 か月前議論

Anthropic should run it on their own code

cerved

3 か月前議論

not strictly speaking, but in practice it's the tip of the remote default branch

cerved

3 か月前議論

For $380B you can get both AT&T and Verizon and you pay ~1.55x the revenue. Why pay 38x for Starlink?

cerved

4 か月前議論

Tip, you may want to use origin/HEAD over origin/master

cerved

4 か月前議論

It does

cerved

4 か月前議論

Would me be nice to try this on lcg (CP-SAT) solvers

cerved

4 か月前議論

Is the a b test tired to the installation or the user?

cerved

4 か月前議論

I instruct Claude to write like peff, writes much better commit messages now

cerved

5 か月前議論

If only the streaming giants would let us stream in decent quality..

cerved

7 か月前議論

So it does a forced reset of the dirt after each bash command? Does it confuse Claude? I frequently find it lacks path awareness of what it's working directory is

cerved

7 か月前議論

Hey Boris, can you teach CC how to use cd?

コメント