HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

chrisrickard

no profile record

コメント

chrisrickard
·10 日前·議論
Of course it’s an Australian spider
chrisrickard
·2 か月前·議論
Cursor 3 is a full rewrite. No VS Code
chrisrickard
·2 か月前·議論
I’ve found it interesting too.

It’s like I spent 20 years mastering painting in watercolour… nerding out on other painters, canvas options, even the backstory on some guy that makes a specific paint etc.

And I don’t regret any of that. but now I’m just loving creating my art 100x faster.

I thought I loved the craft (and I did) but more, I loved the product.
chrisrickard
·2 か月前·議論
… i’m still seeing a therapist about this time period.
chrisrickard
·3 か月前·議論
Thank you, a refreshingly interesting read
chrisrickard
·5 か月前·議論
I have read all your yearly reviews and you’ve been an inspiration Michael. Keep it up, and I’m glad your 8th year was your happiest yet!
chrisrickard
·5 か月前·議論
Skills are chainable e.g. skill A can invoke skill B and then decide to invoke skill C etc… I don’t believe your slash commands can do this?
chrisrickard
·5 か月前·議論
Very cool, I didn’t realise the web audio API was so extensive these days
chrisrickard
·6 か月前·議論
I did this recently. Created a Skill that had access to executing very specific ific (reviewed) script for DB interaction, that connects to your a replica/anonymised DB, read only user, via VPN, via a jumpbox.
chrisrickard
·6 か月前·議論
Really fun idea treating an album like a dependency!
chrisrickard
·6 か月前·議論
Also, probably a good way to give LLMs more context compared to “div soup”
chrisrickard
·7 か月前·議論
Amazing achievement guys, seriously impressive. Now onwards and upwards!
chrisrickard
·7 か月前·議論
very cool concept. and great tracks. congrats on shipping!
chrisrickard
·8 か月前·議論
Another 15-yearer here too! Thank you HN, and for all the work you do @dang and @tomhow
chrisrickard
·8 か月前·議論
Because the ridiculous scope creep perhaps? And spending $96M of government money on an website (still with large faults that were backed out)

This was Accenture and Deloitte - not some backyard dev shop.
chrisrickard
·9 か月前·議論
I’m working on Userdoc, a spec-driven development workspace.

Break down your software requirements (Userdoc guides you through the process), refine/confirm, setup your technical specs, coding/business guidelines & guardrails, and then create development plans (specs) which can be easily consumed by coding agents via MCP, or by platforms like Lovable / v0 using Markdown. Working on Cursor background agent integration atm.

https://userdoc.com
chrisrickard
·9 か月前·議論
Your second point “planning in advance” could be referred to as spec-driven development… it’s a funny term in a sense (didn’t we always do that?), but I think your 7th point drives it home “a very weird form of management” - clear instructions, necessary context, and actionable feedback. As far as written words go, much more like waterfall than agile.
chrisrickard
·10 か月前·議論
This is why AI development will be huge in the “Buy vs Build” space… Businesses (with a capable tech team)can build the 20% of the SaaS they need, and stop paying for the 80% every single month.
chrisrickard
·10 か月前·議論
We are tackling this at https://userdoc.fyi - we help you build your specs (epics, stories, acceptance criteria, tech notes, test cases, etc) - then you can generate what we call Dev Plans, one or more requirement layers for implementation.

e.g maybe a dev plan is all your authentication feature requirements, or in the house of analogy – all the requirements for the rooms, but with instructions to actually just first build the floor, and the walls.

Dev plans then slice the reqs into meaningful units of work, as mentioned in the article – a feature/story, is often too large of a checkpoint, or often needs to be implemented in collaboration with other features/stories, so it understands the correct architectural context,.

You can then implement Dev plans over MCP, or copy to .md for tools like Lovable or V0.