HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

cientifico

no profile record

投稿

You're a team lead. Now what?

cientifico.net
4 ポイント·投稿者 cientifico·3 か月前·2 コメント

Bring Buddy Back

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 cientifico·3 か月前·0 コメント

You not always need an autonomous team

cientifico.net
1 ポイント·投稿者 cientifico·3 か月前·0 コメント

Efficiency vs. Flexibility Framework

cientifico.net
1 ポイント·投稿者 cientifico·3 か月前·0 コメント

It is time to redefine what a senior engineer is

cientifico.net
3 ポイント·投稿者 cientifico·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

cientifico
·先月·議論
Correction in 2. Contrary to popular believe, sunnier countries in Europe have higher deficiency in vitamin d.

Spain have lower levels of vitamin d than Denmark.
cientifico
·先月·議論
Also got it last year.

I used to play with omarchy. It is good enough for a lot of use cases. For powerful work I just connect to remote session.

Perfect for planes in economy
cientifico
·2 か月前·議論
Love it.

I would love that the size of the article is based on the number of upvotes (hardcoded).

* > 500 => take full width or 3. * 500 > 100 => Show it as right now. * > 100 => Just show the title.
cientifico
·2 か月前·議論
Right now, local inference only make sense for privacy reasons.

This is common when processing PII. Lawyers, doctors our similar should not be using cloud solutions.

Also it's harder to setup and always more expensive than any cloud solution.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
We tend to forget
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
There is one missing that i am using as primary for the last 5 years.

The UX pyramid but applied to DX.

It basically states that you should not focus in making something significant enjoyable or convenient if you don't have something that is usable, reliable or remotely functional.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ux+pyramid
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
In my case. The prompt is normally a collection of ideas connected over time. Ai groups, structure, challenges and help me organize that ideas. Then, once I see something that I consider worth sharing, I ask to draft a blog post. 20 iterations over, and I have a blog post.

The prompt is normally larger than the content generated.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
I find some parallelism between writing articles and Pull requests.

We are moving to a point in time, where we don't care if the PR was written by AI. We care that the author understand what is about, that it tested it and in general, we want the ownership.

With articles is the same. I don't care if it was written by AI, if the content is interesting, and ai make it easier to digest... That's a win win.

The problem is not the presentation. Is the content.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
My self.

LLM helps me communicate my ideas better.

Thinking in different angles, focus on the main idea, structure in a post series... It constantly challenge my mess.

Opus and I, iterate over 20 times a single blog post.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
Unpopular opinion.

Until now, ideas were only relevant when the owner was able to communicate then regardless of the impact of the idea.

LLM "democratize"(VC term) sharing ideas, as people with low communication skills can be heard.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
For most users that wanted to run LLM locally, ollama solved the UX problem.

One command, and you are running the models even with the rocm drivers without knowing.

If llama provides such UX, they failed terrible at communicating that. Starting with the name. Llama.cpp: that's a cpp library! Ollama is the wrapper. That's the mental model. I don't want to build my own program! I just want to have fun :-P
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
Click on any Youtube video from any web in android. If you press anything that is not the back button immediately, you will loose the option to go back.

So this coming from google... it's funny. Welcome, but funny.
cientifico
·3 か月前·議論
Thanks, I agree.

I’ve been asking myself the same thing for years. My take:

1. Peter Principle: people get promoted to their level of incompetence.

2. In many companies, it’s the only way to increase salary.

3. Some developers think it gives them more leverage or impact.

But honestly, most of the time it’s simpler: stakeholders want more output, and the best dev gets pushed into leading because there’s no one else.

It’s often less a “promotion” and more a gap the company needs to fill.
cientifico
·5 か月前·議論
This feels jumping on the train of complain about Europe and fully bias.

If I apply my own bias I will call it:

    American companies abuse their dominance my enforcing non documented requirements, making other companies not able to reach their users.
cientifico
·5 か月前·議論
Github says 2.8k files when selecting c (including headers...) https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Asystemd%2Fsystemd++langua...

If the project is even split in different parts that you need to understand... already makes the point.
cientifico
·6 か月前·議論
Looking for postgres unikernel seems like some people are trying seriously...

https://nanovms.com/dev/tutorials/running-postgres-as-a-unik...
cientifico
·7 か月前·議論
I don't know how it is in US, but in Europe, the amount of scams is growing. Twitter blue checkmark was created to distinguish real humans vs scammers.

The fine was to protected the users from that scam.

I like paying taxes to protected the users that don't have the ability to detect scams as we all here have (most of the time).

EU miss the point equally to the Congress in uuss when non tech people believe they can rule (or just lobbied).

But on this case, there will be no problem if Twitter had decided to use another checkmark for pro accounts.
cientifico
·7 か月前·議論
That it's an osx ONLY app.
cientifico
·7 か月前·議論
One hidden gem.

The closest free alternative is https://www.mitmproxy.org/ that is not even close.

And off course, https://www.wireshark.org/ but that is too generic and with a bigger learning curve.

Worth the money. And no subscription (or there weren't a subscription back then)
cientifico
·7 か月前·議論
Services (or a set of Microservices) should mimic teams at the company. If we have polytree, that should represent departments.