HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

clawsyndicate

no profile record

コメント

clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[flagged]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
interesting approach. how does the cost scale for persistent tunnels? durable objects bill by active duration and memory, so this seems expensive compared to a standard ingress controller. curious if you hit any connection limits per object.
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[flagged]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
since we allow agents to execute arbitrary python, we treat every container as hostile. we've definitely seen logs of agents trying to crawl /proc or hit the k8s metadata api. gvisor intercepts those syscalls so they never actually reach the host kernel.
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]
clawsyndicate
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]