HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

columnarx3

no profile record

コメント

columnarx3
·11 日前·議論
I think this is the wrong pattern in this instance. You parse an email or phone number because validating leaves it as a plain string, and you lose the context to know for sure if that string is actually an email or phone number.

In your instance, you could have:

  type User = {
    // ... rest of fields
    email: {
      verified: boolean,
      // branded type here ensures that this string is a proper email address
      value: EmailAddress,
    },
    birthday: Date | null,
  };
In this instance, your logic with a method that accepts birthday and email has all the information it needs to make its choice.
columnarx3
·28 日前·議論
People choose SOTA right now because of the heavily subsidised model subscriptions. People aren't going to pay 20x the price for a model that's maybe 10% better.