HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

compiler-guy

7,241 カルマ登録 11 年前

投稿

The 'Father of the Internet' is finally retiring

techcrunch.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·昨日·1 コメント

Parachute use to prevent death: a review of Randomized Controlled Trials

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
3 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·4 日前·1 コメント

The Cost of Free Doughnuts

npr.org
4 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·2 か月前·0 コメント

That post never existed. Stop listening to that thing

rachelbythebay.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·2 か月前·0 コメント

Why Reproducible Builds?

reproducible-builds.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·2 か月前·0 コメント

Multi-Architecture Continuous Testing at Google

hackthology.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·4 か月前·0 コメント

Clawdbot Showed Me What the Future of Personal AI Assistants Looks Like

macstories.net
1 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·6 か月前·1 コメント

Users don't always conform to the perfect visions of engineers (2011)

rachelbythebay.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 compiler-guy·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

compiler-guy
·4 日前·議論
In the early days of commercial optical-character-recognition software, vendors would brag about 99% accuracy.

But a single-spaced-typewritten page has about 500 words, so you were looking at five typos every single page. It was good at the time, but you still had to manually check every single word.
compiler-guy
·4 日前·議論
I support a bevy of older people with older computers, senior-citizen types. Upgrades are expensive. Monetarily, but also in retraining. These folks don't want the latest UI, they want what is familiar, and retraining is super annoying.

Computers that were EOL a few years ago, running ten-year-old browsers, are absolutely routine.
compiler-guy
·4 日前·議論
One classic paper for on this topic:

_Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials_

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC300808/

"Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute."
compiler-guy
·4 日前·議論
Sparc and Xtensa also have register windows, although each has a slightly different implementation.

They were all the rage for a while, because they make procedure calls fast but turn out to have subtle issues in highly-multithreaded scenarios.
compiler-guy
·9 日前·議論
Thousands, maybe tens-of-thousands, leave tech companies everyday and never post anything. You just don’t hear about them.
compiler-guy
·14 日前·議論
https://tessil.github.io/2016/08/29/benchmark-hopscotch-map....

Has some older benchmarks, including those two.
compiler-guy
·15 日前·議論
Pretty sure greed existed long before capitalism was a twinkle in any economist's eye. The East India Company was rapacious and evil and full of greed. But it was mercantilist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercantilism
compiler-guy
·15 日前·議論
"A linen shirt … is, strictly speaking, not a necessary of life. The Greeks and Romans lived, I suppose, very comfortably though they had no linen. But in the present times, through the greater part of Europe, a creditable day-labourer would be ashamed to appear in public without a linen shirt, the want of which would be supposed to denote that disgraceful degree of poverty which, it is presumed, nobody can well fall into without extreme bad conduct."

--Adam Smith (yes, that Adam Smith) _Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations_
compiler-guy
·15 日前·議論
It takes about 3-4 years to build a fab and ten-billion dollars.

https://download.intel.com/newsroom/2022/manufacturing/fab-f...

And even if someone were able to magically build one in half the time, that would certainly drive up the cost quite dramatically, and would still be two-ish years from production.

The history of the memory industry is jam-packed with booms and busts, and companies that over-provisioned capacity during the boom times, only to have the bust happen as the fab is coming on line, are the ones that fail.

=-=-=-=

"William de Gale, portfolio manager at BlueBox Asset Management, told CNBC’s Europe Early Edition on Wednesday that the industry tends to have “enormous ups and downs”.

“In the long run it’s a pretty dreadful industry,” he said.

“I suspect that’s still the case every time people make an argument that the memory cycle is gone, and it’s now a long-term value-creating industry – just before it all goes horribly wrong.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/25/memory-stocks-cyclical-boom-...
compiler-guy
·24 日前·議論
This really isn't true. I'm nothing special and have survived in the FAANG world for going on two decades. Excepting the very new in their careers, nearly everyone on my team has managed good length careers at the various FANNGS, possibly with stops at smaller companies.

It was the startups prior to those that were terribly unstable and where you couldn't be sure your badge would open the door when you came to work.

Meta may be a dumpster fire today, and the others have had bad layoffs, true. But they all have huge headcounts, and median employee tenure that is above average in the industry.

Of course, saving for catastrophe is wise, especially in these times, but that's true no matter if you work for a FAANG or a startup.
compiler-guy
·25 日前·議論
Chesterton's fence has two parts:

1. I want to remove a rule

2. Understand why that rule is in place before proceeding

This article deals with the second part, but not the first. So it is only about about half of Chesterton's fence at best.

In these examples, a rule (avoid blocking calls) is in place to guide the programmer to a performant system. Programmers apparently thought that if they found a way to avoid directly blocking calls, but managed to indirectly block, they had still obeyed the rule. And strictly by the most narrow reading of the rule they had obeyed it. But they had defeated the purpose of the rule.

So definitely Chesterton's Fence adjacent, but not Chesterton's Fence itself.
compiler-guy
·29 日前·議論
Whatever else music theory is, "immature" isn't one of them.

Western music theory has evolved over literally thousands of years. You can put a very rough start of it to Pythagoras, around 550BCe ish, which gives us 2,500 years of evolution and refinement.

But even if you want to start with the popularity and adoption of the major scale, that was around 1500CE ish, which gives us a solid 500 years. It handles many, many corner cases quite gracefully.

It undoubtedly has its quirks, but any notational system for this will also have its quirks (cf, the difference between systems of intonation). There is just no way around it.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
Even before the internet, employees were making these kinds of criticisms at lunch, at the water cooler and during their car pools.

If the company forbids it on visible internal channels, it will just pop up on external, private channels. With less corporate control and less corporate visibility and more leaks.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
If one is writing trailers and custom formatters, then probably the information that the formatter uses should be even more structured that sticking it in the subject line.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
COMPANY-1234 in the title doesn't tell the reader all that much about the the feature or motivation. It does tell the client, but I'm not seeing why that is better than having it in the description as a tag, or some other nice way of extracting it.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
SoA can be a big win. But so can plain AoS, just depends on the access pattern.

Profiling important workloads matters. Without that everything else is guesswork.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
Right. Places without unlimited PTO get neither the upsides nor the downsides of unlimited PTO.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
Some people do like it, and I'm glad it's working out for them--I really am.

But adding all that manager and corporate discretion sets one up for abuse when things go wrong at either the manager or corporate level. For some, I suppose the benefit is worth it--but if "unlimited vs set days has almost no bearing on how many PTO days someone will actually take", then people are giving up a lot of guarantees for very little benefit on their side. Especially the payout when you leave.
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
Pretty much every article on a naive Google search lists "reduced financial liability" as one of the corporate benefits. Even the ones that talk about more complicated financial scenarios deal with "unexpectedly short-staffed" rather than, "We have a big financial liability on our books."

A somewhat random example:

https://www.higginbotham.com/blog/unlimited-pto-pros-cons/

"Cost efficiency. Traditional PTO policies can result in financial liabilities due to unused vacation payouts when employees leave the company. With unlimited PTO, these liabilities are eliminated. This can be particularly advantageous for companies looking to manage their finances more effectively."
compiler-guy
·先月·議論
"Contracted minimum with more at manager's discretion" isn't what people usually mean when they talk about unlimited pto.