cool_hw

I did a quick search earlier and it seems these are informational only and not necessarily persistent warnings. Some discussion suggested that some unsupported requests to the disk can result in these, but I don't know for sure.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

-------

    vim/vim is licensed under the Vim License

    There are no restrictions on using or distributing an unmodified copy of the software. Parts of the software may also be distributed, but the license text must always be included. For modified versions a few restrictions apply. The license is GPL compatible, you may compile the software with GPL libraries and distribute it.

-------

Source, if anyone wants to dig deeper: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/vim-license.txt

Unsure why I'm being downvoted but okay.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

fzf.vim works better, in my subjective opinion, but I haven't configured telescope a lot.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Treesitter integration is a bit easier in neovim IMHO (but I haven't tried to make it work with vim too much.)

Newer plugin development seems to be much more on the nvim side than vim as well. (Although I do feel fzf is superior to telescope, at least out of the box.)

I'm happy neovim exists, it rekindled vim development.

Also, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the bus factor 1 on vim?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

This is exactly the kind of comparison that prompted me to post this topic. I suppose macOS just uses the SSD far more.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

How does your workload look?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Thanks.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Thanks for sharing, is this a 1TB drive?

Going by the percentage used, looks like an expected lifespan of 1200TBW.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Power On Hours seem to indicate the disk has been on for a good chunk of time, so I would think you're doing fine. Percentage used says 6%, so that seems decent too.

What model SSD is this?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

I think most folks will.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

What is your RAM/SSD config?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

This is why I asked here. Most folks don't seem to mind it, but it is an order of magnitude, if not more, higher disk usage than linux.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Is there a noticeable difference in battery life usage with option 1?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

I think that's because `power on` hours is talking about the disk being in the power on state, not the rest of the machine.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Wow, that's a well used machine!

cool_hw

4 年前議論

> Addendum. I just wrote 1.7GB in the last 30mins while reading HN on Firefox, and a few other web pages.

Thanks for sharing this. I need to see if linux does this.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Is there a way to look up that error log?

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Perhaps one day when Apple prices the RAM upgrades reasonably..

cool_hw

4 年前議論

Thank you for the data point, and your usage on an M1 will probably yield crazier numbers. This is why I asked, Apple silicon machines look like they're using the disk far more than older macs.

cool_hw

4 年前議論

I noticed that on my linux machine the available spare threshold number is 10% too.

Thank you for posting, this (and the sibling posts and some google searching) confirms to me that older macs were not using disks this much for the same tasks.

I still may be wrong about this, but I am yet to see a counterpoint from Apple Silicon machines.

投稿

Ask HN: Has the Apple Silicon excessive disk read/write issue been fixed?

n/a

コメント