croisillon

3 日前議論

as a user with some technical understanding, Hubspot is surprisingly horrible, so it could be about anything they do really

croisillon

4 日前議論

but apart from 10 years Warren, 6 years Knight, 8 years Reagan, 8 years Deukmejian, 8 years Wilson, 8 years Schwarzenegger, when did Republicans ever win any election in California?

croisillon

4 日前議論

sure, i'm not saying any of this is fake, just that the writing is absolutely disgusting

croisillon

4 日前議論

AI slop

croisillon

5 日前議論

careful what you wish: https://www.facebook.com/fpoe/photos/-70-jahre-fp%C3%B6-das-...

croisillon

5 日前議論

the big far-right party in Austria recently did an AI poster for their 70 year celebration, and there really were 2 type of responses

- not their target group, thinking it was cringe and boomer-ish

- their uncritical target group, who loved a polished picture of blonde people

croisillon

5 日前議論

the saying "comparing x and y" implies that you compare something that one of them can't compete ; if people praise the softness of the skin first and foremost, comparing apples and potatoes won't lead interesting results

croisillon

8 日前議論

so it's a crossover of dev tools and LLM? sounds sane enough i'd say

croisillon

11 日前議論

i could swear i have read that same story here before but can't find it

croisillon

13 日前議論

short of this radio, you can also play Stellardrone https://stellardrone.bandcamp.com/

croisillon

14 日前議論

calling California a one-party-state is a bit exagerated: even the Democrats have had a governor from time to time too, in the past 100 (or the past 60, or the past 40) years

croisillon

18 日前議論

from the text:

  "They quietly updated their messaging to praise the protocol once the story was already out."
  "Two closed platforms. Two open source projects. Two cases of building on community infrastructure while obscuring that fact for as long as possible."
  "Then, with no announcement and no explanation, the repository was deleted. Not deprecated. Not redirected. Deleted."
  "These are not the same politics."
  "None of that makes W Social evil. It does however make the "this is for the people" framing worth scrutinising."
  "Davos doesn't mean grassroots. W Social is what happens when the establishment decides again that it wants its own internet: it finds the nearest community-built toolkit, rebrands it, performs openness long enough to land institutional credibility, then closes the door. The users become the product. The community becomes the unpaid resource. The mission statement becomes the marketing."

from the headings:

  "The Ideology Is Different. The Structure Isn't."
  "Why This Matters Right Now"

etc etc

croisillon

20 日前議論

There is a new “mural” (a 10m tall graffiti painting if you will) that is -obviously, but not ironically- an orange-toned AI designed picture, probably commmissioned bu the company the house belongs to ; makes my eyes bleed everytime

croisillon

21 日前議論

oh that's the correct link, well done! i distinctly remember the condition i was and that can only be July 2011 ; i have been lurking 2 more years before eventually creating an account here

croisillon

22 日前議論

i remember of such a link in July 2011 but i could only find that one which is a bit different

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2806377

croisillon

22 日前議論

i wish there was a disclosure about letting LLM write this article

croisillon

26 日前議論

and now Iran is getting fresh €250 banknotes, impressive gambit sir

croisillon

先月議論

constantly lowering my luminosity instead of refreshing my page :(

croisillon

先月議論

the domain name of my former employer was 18 digits long and i had to login in 10 services a day with it, it was a bit horrible

having a 10 digits tld is self-harming

croisillon

先月議論

> anti-natal communitarianism of SF

oh boy

コメント