HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

cschep

1,516 カルマ登録 18 年前
chris at schepman dot org github.com/cschep schepman.org

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/cschep; my proof: https://keybase.io/cschep/sigs/VuVbD2gPjIhJeL7_LLb8E0XkKZED-DfC9SDnj61OjIY ]

コメント

cschep
·昨日·議論
keyboard input please!
cschep
·2 か月前·議論
this also means that more cafes are easily within reach of a cycle, where a jog can't quite get you there. plus cycling after a huge sandwich and a coffee is a lot easier than running :)
cschep
·5 か月前·議論
oops, yup.
cschep
·5 か月前·議論
#2 cannot be understated
cschep
·7 か月前·議論
flawless is a wild take.
cschep
·8 か月前·議論
oh my god. I am a fucking idiot.

I thought we were talking about BUYING THE SECRETARY A GIFT. E.g. breaking his commitment to his wife through some implied/emotional cheating?

Having the secretary buy the gift? My god who cares. I have no argument against that at all.

Sorry I feel like I should delete all my comments but.. such is the internet.
cschep
·8 か月前·議論
I think we are having a fundamental disagreement about "being tricked" happening at all. I'm intelligent enough to follow the argument.

I see that, in the hyperbolic case, you are actively tricking your wife. I just don't agree that you are actively tricking randomly public visitors of a blog in any real way? there is no agreement in place such that you can "trick" them. Presumably you made commitments in your marriage. No commitments were made to the public when a blog got posted.

It's equally baffling to me that you would use one case to make the point of the other. It doesn't make any fucking sense.
cschep
·8 か月前·議論
I do appreciate this side of the argument but.. do you think that the level/strength of a marriage commitment is worthy of comparison to walking by someone in public / riding the same subway as them randomly / visiting their blog?

They seem world's apart to me!
cschep
·8 か月前·議論
This is an absurd comparison - you (presumably) made a commitment to your wife. There is no such commitment on a public blog?
cschep
·9 か月前·議論
I can't tell if this is a genuine question or not but if it is.. deploying a Ruby on Rails app with a pile of gems that have c deps isn't fixed with static linking. This is true for python and node and probably other things I'm not thinking of.
cschep
·9 か月前·議論
ahh sorry I didn't understand. I'm so used to cmt-tab, cmd-` but I'm not at all claiming that's "most" efficient. makes sense why people would want that. I wish Apple would "just" add a fucking checkbox somewhere for that. Seems like a thing people really want.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
You can’t expect anything that isn’t in the original agreement. If you want to sell software, sell it!

If you don’t want a megacorp using your software, don’t give it away. Or license it such that they can’t do what you don’t want them to do.

This retroactive take backs shit is so, so bad for everyone involved.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
cmd-tab does this. what are we missing? cmd-tab, cmd-tab. terminal, browser. browser, terminal. has for years.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
Ok, I'll bite.

While we are on Hacker News, this is still an enormously obtuse way to communicate.

Are you saying that as users of git we will be negatively affected by deps being added and build times going up? Do you have evidence of that from past projects adding rust?

Why not just say that??
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
My guess is that we (I am also a user of git) won't even notice.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
can you imagine allowing this into your house? who is this for? I guess maybe if they give the fridges away.. oh god don't give them ideas.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
I'd love to have a system where I could run a script from the command line to randomly choose an episode from my collection and airplay it to my tv.

Are those API's available here? anyone know?

Cool!

edit: Without full mirror mode. I use Airflow for this right now and I love it, but would be more fun with automation.
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
There used to be a world where you could get INTO the investment with almost free money. You can't get a 2% loan and dump it into the stock market. Well you can't do either anymore but you used to be able to :)
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
to the replies that we shouldn't use fiction to aid decision making -- yes of course! how rational. how reasonable.

.. but perhaps can we access deep wisdom by paying attention the recurring themes of myths?

.. and perhaps does "The Matrix" access any of these themes?

(yes and yes!)
cschep
·10 か月前·議論
Is this the equivalent to the humans nuking the sky to fight the robots in the Matrix? I don't think that worked.