HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

dbbk

2,174 カルマ登録 11 年前
Making it up as I go along. Meetings and calls!

投稿

Test the Email Verification Protocol with an origin trial

developer.chrome.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 dbbk·一昨日·0 コメント

コメント

dbbk
·昨日·議論
Yes it was an intentionally added feature, that was extremely bad.
dbbk
·一昨日·議論
I really love the Opus/Fable models but I'm honestly sick to death of the buggy product. The CLI always has some weird issue. Right now it doesn't even output messages before tool calls, it just swallows them and they disappear.

I don't like OpenAI as a company, but they appear to have QA, and that is probably enough to get me to switch.
dbbk
·一昨日·議論
Not really. They dramatically overhaul the products. Bloated staff are cut, old tech-debt-saddled systems are thrown out and rewritten. In some cases they basically just keep the brand and the database and rebuild the product around that, in a smaller and leaner manner.

I actually think the model is interesting.
dbbk
·一昨日·議論
"In their right mind?" I wouldn't start a project in anything other than TypeScript now. My platform is a monorepo across web and native mobile (Expo), and is TypeScript throughout. All my types flow everywhere automatically. Even the shape of a database table is shared with the native app with tRPC. Nothing can break the type contract anywhere. How would you do that with another language?
dbbk
·一昨日·議論
We could just not have AI models that generate CSAM I don't think that's too much to ask
dbbk
·3 日前·議論
Read the post
dbbk
·3 日前·議論
It sounds like they've switched to a "native audio" model which if I understand right is what Gemini has had for quite a while?
dbbk
·4 日前·議論
I said that
dbbk
·5 日前·議論
That landed a few months ago
dbbk
·5 日前·議論
Cloudflare Snippets were actually better if you wanted to run logic before the cache (they are entirely free)
dbbk
·5 日前·議論
I was a bit confused what this adds other than just standard CDN-Cache-Control page caching that we do now. Some quirks I've found;

- You still get billed per request, whether the request hits cache or not (but don't get billed for CPU time)

- You now get billed for static asset requests! This makes no sense to me. "One thing to watch: when caching is enabled, requests that are normally free — static asset requests and worker-to-worker invocations through service bindings or ctx.exports — are billed at the standard request rate, because each one now consults the cache in front of your Worker." Yeah that sounds like a bug that just happens to generate them more money.

- The cache key automatically has the worker deployment version, so even gradual deployments populate their own cache which is nice

- It seems like you can set a totally custom cache key? But that was previously Enterprise only, can't see if that's still the case here.
dbbk
·6 日前·議論
The copy paste approach is just a plain bad idea, I am not sure why this doesn't get more criticism
dbbk
·6 日前·議論
It's so staccato throughout, a human wouldn't write like this.
dbbk
·9 日前·議論
You probably shouldn't unless you're doing hardcore cybersecurity
dbbk
·10 日前·議論
Oh come on Opus is perfectly good enough for any coding task. You will barely notice when it drops down from Fable.
dbbk
·16 日前·議論
This isn't immediate though, it's from August
dbbk
·16 日前·議論
Yeah even Claude Cowork would do this, doesn't need "computer use"
dbbk
·17 日前·議論
> And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful.

I honestly cannot think of a single use case
dbbk
·17 日前·議論
I would say their Codex product is probably better, I just don't use it because I prefer Opus
dbbk
·17 日前·議論
Dispatch... Remote Control... it's baffling