HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

deepnotderp

no profile record

投稿

6th RISC-V Workshop Proceedings

riscv.org
146 ポイント·投稿者 deepnotderp·9 年前·69 コメント

コメント

deepnotderp
·6 か月前·議論
> t also required just the right combination of natural resources (coal) and economic conditionsL deforestation

This argument is repeated often, but I don't think it's really true. Both Savery and Newcomen's engines were initially aimed at evacuating flooded metal mines and not coal mines.
deepnotderp
·9 か月前·議論
It’s difficult to cmp diamond is the issue I’d assume
deepnotderp
·9 か月前·議論
Yay for fracking!

Yay for natural gas!
deepnotderp
·9 か月前·議論
New hardware could greatly reduce inference and training costs and solve that issue
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
Yes but one of the reasons that coal is being replaced by gas is because of the capex of the steam turbine
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
Oh my bad, you’re right

Re: Nat gas, agreed, it’s not solar though, storage is much more expensive

Thermal energy still needs to drive a turbine to generate electricity
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
Sure, but conventional DRAM endurance is 10^15 or more
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
$3/GJ is $108/MWH which any large scale fission buildout would easily beat for thermal energy costs
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
10^11 cycles is not “practically unlimited endurance”, that’s less than a second of use at 1 GHz
deepnotderp
·10 か月前·議論
Thermal storage has very poor discharge rates unfortunately (usually slower than a day), as well as surprisingly high cost once you factor in inefficiencies and turbine cost
deepnotderp
·2 年前·議論
I enjoy how people are dunking on this by saying “omg this is what happens when engineers dare to have thoughts on other topics” when this is very similar to the theory for CBT in psychology