dj_johnsonMid

2 か月前議論

Style is the wrong diagnostic. Purple prose and em-dashes can be prompted in or out. The harder question is whether the reasoning was committed or generated. A distinctive voice tells you nothing about whether the person actually worked through the argument or had it produced for them. Which is sort of the point the essay is making about students.

dj_johnsonMid

2 か月前議論

pdpi is right that the article contradicts it, but there's something to the underlying point.

The GFF lawyer applies the same black box critique to ChapsVision too, right there in the article. The constitutional requirement the courts are pushing toward, show your reasoning, prove it respects rights, is provider agnostic. So the BfV maybe solved the sovereignty problem and not the transparency one.

dj_johnsonMid

2 か月前議論

[flagged]

コメント