djjdj · HackerTrans

So killing Russians for 8 years by openly Neo-nazi forces is pro-active. Glad to know it. 15000 civilians have already died in the conflict. I condemn that Putin has supported Donbass military ambitions because for me speaking Ukrainian is better than being dead and shelled every day. But if we consider culture of significance, the argument is not shallow. I also condemn him for not doing it earlier because this indecisiveness has been the main cause of people deaths. You either go to war or don't.

djjdj

4 年前議論

I'm from Russia and late to the party. Funny that nobody doubts that it is Russia's engdame (you could have showed at least some critical judgement). I don't really know what the Russia's endgame is. But I think that we don't have many years of MAD left. Rather soon (during my lifetime) Russia's technological gap is going to become huge enough for nuclear weapons stop matter anymore.

djjdj

5 年前議論

I disagree. Of course, it doesn't understand anything, it is a statistical language model. I also think that human jokes are mostly statistical in nature. That's why "Yes, but they will have to get married first" is funny. GPT was trained using texts from the Internet. It usually contains jokes and not logic predicates. At any prompt that has a structure of a joke, it will use (in the majority of the attempts) a pattern for a joke even if there is none. "If X is y, is X z?" is a typical joke pattern. If logical approach is applied in the future, it will still be derived from the statistics/reinforcement learning or something like that (the key word here is training/learning). The world is just too vast. If you want to have a resemblance of a logic model, you need a special dataset, but it will still just exploit patterns. It might be good enough, for practical use. It is arguable, if people mostly operate beyond patterns. Sorry if my text looks patronising or smth like that. I just assume.

コメント