HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

documentorium

no profile record

投稿

Every Trade Contract Needs These 12 Clauses

documentorium.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 documentorium·3 か月前·0 コメント

Change Orders – Get the Signature Before You Pick Up the Tool

documentorium.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 documentorium·3 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 documentorium·4 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Any Tradespeople Here?

4 ポイント·投稿者 documentorium·4 か月前·2 コメント

コメント

documentorium
·先月·議論
Did you check this out? https://isactiv.com/ - Private social network - exactly what you describe
documentorium
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
documentorium
·3 か月前·議論
I built a document engine for trades and am looking for feedback. I'm happy to give a longer trial and understand better how you are creating estimates/quotes/contracts for your customers. Take a look: documentorium.com - free to use without an account, and get extra features with an account(prefill data, history and more in the future).
documentorium
·4 か月前·議論
Thanks for the feedback. I'll try to respond to each part.

- the ones who do this by hand - they need to keep track of individual files etc, fill them manually each time - i try to solve it for them.

- the larger shops - i am not targeting them and i don't think i compete with bigger platforms here, that's where my price comes into play - cheaper than anything else, without the extra features - it's a clear tool, usable anywhere.

When i decided to build something for tradespeople, i validated this in another market(another country, but a subset of these trades) where "people wanted to create PDFs for their services, and send it to customers". And it worked, it's somewhat successful (hundreds of paying users, almost all renewed their yearly, price is too small to matter as a yearly cost).

I think "no bullshit" tools for this market(0-5 employees) are missing, or are expesive/monthly/per user etc. I think they are wrong.

I also think that the selling point is not the big library - once you're in, you will have the option to only see stuff you actually use, but the clarity and ease of use(lessons learned from the other market) + the output that you care about, FAST.

I'm trying to validate and integrate feedback.

I hope i answered all your points.

Bogdan

edit: formatting