HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

dtoma

124 カルマ登録 13 年前

投稿

OCaml 5.5.0 Released

discuss.ocaml.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·22 日前·0 コメント

Cppfront: Midsummer Update

herbsutter.com
13 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·2 年前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·2 年前·0 コメント

Service Weaver: a framework for writing and deploying cloud applications

serviceweaver.dev
1 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·3 年前·0 コメント

Our technology stack, and how we got here

exploring-better-ways.bellroy.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·3 年前·0 コメント

In Defense of Crusty Old Swiss Army Knives

zachgoldstein.engineering
2 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·3 年前·0 コメント

Speeding up Rust semver-checking by over 2000x

predr.ag
1 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·3 年前·0 コメント

Soursop and Ponies in Kona: A C++ Committee Trip Report

cor3ntin.github.io
62 ポイント·投稿者 dtoma·4 年前·67 コメント

コメント

dtoma
·15 日前·議論
> all that socialist bullshit she produced

... what? How's that the first thing that comes to mind about her, before "neoliberal", "conservative", or "austerity"? For that matter, when has the CDU ever been anywhere near socialist, in Germany or in the EU parliament?

100% agree we're still dealing with the fallout from her policies though.
dtoma
·2 年前·議論
The "streaming systems" book answers your question and more: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/streaming-systems/97814.... It gives you a history of how batch processing started with MapReduce, and how attempts at scaling by moving towards streaming systems gave us all the subsequent frameworks (Spark, Beam, etc.).

As for the framework called MapReduce, it isn't used much, but its descendant https://beam.apache.org very much is. Nowadays people often use "map reduce" as a shorthand for whatever batch processing system they're building on top of.
dtoma
·3 年前·議論
If anything, the origin of the 5th republic under its founding president used referendums to validate the president's actions. He literally resigned after losing a referendum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle#Retirement.
dtoma
·3 年前·議論
I don't understand this point, and it's one we see very often. What would have happened if they'd been civilised?

1. We had a convention citoyenne pour le climat. Macron then mostly ignored it.

2. We have elected representatives who can vote on the laws for us. Macron then used article 49.3 to mostly ignore them.

3. Vote? For which candidate? None of them would cover all of the GJs' demands.

If you disqualify protests as a valid form of democratic expression, you also disqualify our famous revolution, the feminist protests that earned women the right to vote, the union strikes that earned us many worker rights, etc.

> I'll never trust people who think that violence is justifiable

Ah, that explains it. You only see violence in protesters who break windows, not in governments who enact laws on their people. Am I correct in assuming that you're ok with making people work 20 hours/week for the RSA as well?
dtoma
·3 年前·議論
Who is "as far-right as it gets" if not these two? (in any country you want, not necessarily France)
dtoma
·3 年前·議論
Other variables could have been adjusted (pensions, contributions...). Independent studies showed that our retirement system is very much affordable for our government and will still be 50 years from now. Just today it's also been revealed that the government's plan overestimated its savings by 4B euros...

Are you just repeating a common cliche while not knowing much about the situation?

So yes, unilaterally deciding to raise the retirement age, which doesn't actually fix anything, without having a vote, without listening to the protests, is neither mild nor democratic.
dtoma
·4 年前·議論
I’m sure everyone would agree it’s a bit of both? We’re responsible for not intentionally hurting others, and we’re responsible for not being excessively controlling or sensitive about others’ behaviours?
dtoma
·4 年前·議論
> Having one neutral platform, controlled by no one, with standardized API's and immutable open programs that anyone can permissionlessly build on - is amazing.

Isn't that also an open door to bad actors?