HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

edu

3,152 カルマ登録 19 年前

投稿

Kiss Principle

en.wikipedia.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 edu·3 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

edu
·5 日前·議論
Indeed they were.

Also, it’s interesting to note that in both cases they where two very lean companies (Instagram had 13 employees and WhatsApp had 55) with pretty a pretty large and engaged user base (30 million for Insta and 450 million for WhatsApp)
edu
·8 日前·議論
I read it full and I loved it and bookmarked it.

It resonates with my personal experience, and your writing style is fresh and dynamic.

Thanks for sharing it, and it deserves to be on the front page and #1.
edu
·8 日前·議論
> It took 18 hours of work.

So a couple of days plus a few hours. Seems reasonable.
edu
·19 日前·議論
That’s a lovely book collection, if you have kids it’s a a great present covering inspiring figures (male and female) such as Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing.
edu
·24 日前·議論
Build a $1B startup. Make no mistakes. /s
edu
·26 日前·議論
Discussion from 3 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48504361
edu
·先月·議論
Token seller saying you should buy more tokens.
edu
·2 か月前·議論
Or they don’t, and they* sell access to Mythos and successors through their services company or network of partners and charge a premium.

* they, I mean all foundation models providers, as OpenAI seems to go in the same direction
edu
·2 か月前·議論
This post has been added as a link, instead of a comment one. Then when you click on it you go the linked page.

LGTM
edu
·2 か月前·議論
No, it’s not. One thing is to resell an item after you’ve used/enjoyed it and then maybe its value has increased. Much different is to buy an item to sell immediately and making a quick profit.
edu
·2 か月前·議論
Well, we would refer to chupa-chups (brand) to the ones with a ball head. And Kojaks if they had gum inside.

Piruletas were the flat ones, either circular or heart shaped.
edu
·2 か月前·議論
Pirueta is not lollipop in Spanish, it would be “piruletas” (at least in Spain Spanish).

Piruetas is pirouette, as in what a ice skater might do.
edu
·2 か月前·議論
Issue is there are many apps claiming they can do that, and for many people are “magic”.

We should not allow companies to lie blatantly to the customers.

Edit: r/blame/lie/
edu
·2 か月前·議論
Curious, why it was easier to use an LLM vs a non-AI app with a DB of foods?

Seems that in this case a traditional approach would be more precise and more environmentally efficient to get to the same results.
edu
·2 か月前·議論
You could also nerf your performance at random times and then get good at it again, and extend the illusion for longer.
edu
·3 か月前·議論
So a 100% presses red and everyone survives too.
edu
·3 か月前·議論
VCs
edu
·3 か月前·議論
I concur, seems that lately we’ve collectively forget about the KISS principle.
edu
·3 か月前·議論
Not the OP, but here are my 2 CT’s on what is design:

Design is the process to you follow to solve a given problem/need/desire balancing the user needs with the business/tech constraints. The output could be a a digital UI, a physical object or an intangible process. But often people think about design just as the aesthetics of a product.

A common pattern is the Empathize (Research, Diverge), Define (Converge), Ideate (Diverge), Prototype (Converge), Test (and then iterate).

The main benefits come from the divergent phases: empathize and ideate. But it’s far too common already that some executive has an “illumination” of how something should be and just wants to build as is, without any research or validation.

They can use Claude Design (and similar) to just build a prototype of their first idea, skipping all the design process and end with something that looks good but doesn’t solve the problem adequately or fits the actual user needs/context.

Of course, LLMs are useful tools that can be used in the right way: to build better prototypes in less time, to synthesize research insights, to explore ideas…
edu
·3 か月前·議論
Thing Ai^Ai. It might break the market.