HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

emil-lp

689 カルマ登録 10 か月前

投稿

About That Erdős Problem

siliconreckoner.substack.com
9 ポイント·投稿者 emil-lp·2 か月前·1 コメント

Evolutionary Computation Bestiary

fcampelo.github.io
15 ポイント·投稿者 emil-lp·3 か月前·1 コメント

The $440M Software Error at Knight Capital (2019)

henricodolfing.ch
1 ポイント·投稿者 emil-lp·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

emil-lp
·6 時間前·議論
> But as always, the methodology is buried: how many open problems were tried until they found a success?

Not only that, but they have like 500 world-leading experts in mathematics and IMO alumni, so how do we know one of the agents wasn't hardcoded to return a proof that the mathematicians had found?

I'm a mathematician/graph theorist, and I've tried ChatGPT 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, and now 5.6 on a bunch of simple-ish open problems, and I've never gotten a solution.
emil-lp
·12 時間前·議論
Proof of work doesn't help if the abuser is massively decentralized and is using other peoples moneys.
emil-lp
·13 時間前·議論
> if the work of a programmer can be automated then this means that any work can be automated

This is a very typical programmer thing to say.
emil-lp
·昨日·議論
There's really no good proof system mature enough to do advanced graph theory. The leading library in Lean is Graphlib, and it's really not ready for research level theorems.
emil-lp
·昨日·議論
The prompt was released, but not the cost of the result.
emil-lp
·昨日·議論
Statement of AI use. The proof in this note is entirely due to GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra and the writeup with Codex (with GPT 5.6 Sol).

Clearly that sentence isn't AI generated ...
emil-lp
·一昨日·議論
A heads-up: Frontiers In is a publisher known to have extremely low quality.
emil-lp
·一昨日·議論
The hardcore nerds have always been political. Wake up.

You're using the sell my soul to the devil argument.

If you achieve what you want to, it doesn't matter if you sold your soul on the way.
emil-lp
·5 日前·議論
Why do authors spend so much time coming up with a book when they can literally pick one up for free at the library?
emil-lp
·8 日前·議論
This paper has all the hallmarks of being crackpot with GPT.
emil-lp
·8 日前·議論
NP! should be something like NP^NP, which is well known to be Σ^2_P. Slightly larger, but still inside PH.
emil-lp
·10 日前·議論
Not a single frame showing the robot grabs anything.

Cut scene aaaand folded! It's like magic.
emil-lp
·10 日前·議論
Well, yes, conference proceedings are usually page limited, but that's not a journal.
emil-lp
·10 日前·議論
Which journal?
emil-lp
·10 日前·議論
I don't know which field you're talking about, but in general, math and cs journals do not have page limits.

By the way, one of my favorite pastimes is to download the latex source for papers on arxiv and read all the commented-out stuff.

% we should make sure this theorem is actually true
emil-lp
·11 日前·議論
Friction or flywheel car.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction_motor
emil-lp
·12 日前·議論
I'd buy it and put it in the Drawer of Dreams aka unfinished projects.
emil-lp
·12 日前·議論
You mean ... Like a Beowulf cluster of those?
emil-lp
·13 日前·議論
To save people the bother:

An LLM read a paper and concluded it was a top 1% paper.

Everyone involved were happy.
emil-lp
·14 日前·議論
This is possibly related

EA Open Sources Command and Conquer: Red Alert, along with other games

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43197131