HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

epeus

no profile record

投稿

Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted

kevinmarks.com
408 ポイント·投稿者 epeus·4 年前·245 コメント

Happy 10th Birthday, Bridgy

snarfed.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 epeus·5 年前·0 コメント

コメント

epeus
·3 年前·議論
Is Peter Thiel's opposition to Women's Suffrage still policy at Facebook? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/peter-thiel-women-democracy_n...
epeus
·3 年前·議論
The Microsoft trigger was `text-justify: newspaper` and intended for fully-justified narrow columns. I don't think it made it to Edge.
epeus
·3 年前·議論
That reminds me of this classic 1990s internet description http://stuartcheshire.org/rants/InfoHighway.html
epeus
·4 年前·議論
Tumblr supports them as of May https://changes.tumblr.com/post/683524731509653505/friday-ma...
epeus
·4 年前·議論
More useful information at https://indieweb.org/Webmention-faq
epeus
·4 年前·議論
Indeed - every silo wants you to use their own specific markup, but even then they choose what to show. I made a post a while back that gave a different summary on every silo platform https://www.kevinmarks.com/partialsilos.html Of course, since then some of the silos have died or given up on their own systems, but microformats remains useful if you want to co-operate.
epeus
·4 年前·議論
Both Mastodon and Tumblr have microformats support built in. Twitter and Facebook used to, but they decided they'd rather be silos than protocols
epeus
·4 年前·議論
That's not exactly accurate. The wiki has been edited recently, and change discussions are now done through github issues before updating the wiki, as that is more convenient than inline chat in many cases https://github.com/microformats Also a lot of the practical discussion of microformats use is at the indieweb wiki - see https://indieweb.org/posts#Types_of_Posts for h-entry for example
epeus
·4 年前·議論
Hi Clay, Kevin Marks here. I an help you scrape it out of wordpress into a static site if you like, I've done similar for Dan Gilmor and other old bloggers. Ping me - [email protected]
epeus
·4 年前·議論
Read the post - previously deleted tweets showed the blockquote fallback. Now they get a useless injected blank iframe, removing the blockquote from the dom.
epeus
·4 年前·議論
You're wrong. The tweet embeds decorate a blockquote of the tweet - read the article. The now code removes that blockquote from the DOM.
epeus
·4 年前·議論
And the documentation for the embed api on their website https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-for-websites/e...
epeus
·4 年前·議論
We trusted them because they were committed to being part of the wider web, and as you can see from Ben Ward's tweet at the time, took that seriously.
epeus
·4 年前·議論
If they want to change this, they can have a new version of the widgets script that makes it clear that it will edit your site, and switch to that in future embed links from the site. Changing the existing one is leaving holes all over the web. Buzzfeed is decimated.
epeus
·5 年前·議論
It's not a dogma so much as a warning from experience. If you post to your own site first you do retain control. If you rely on the silos' api to extract it back to your site you are dependent on them remaining committed to their api. That has not been a good bet in the last decade.
epeus
·5 年前·議論
It's not so much that they take ownership, more that they choose who can see it, and can remove it arbitrarily from the web.
epeus
·5 年前·議論
Refusing to use attributes in this kind of *ML and using <param> instead makes this a mess to parse safely. I imagine this will be read as HTML and the params will show up in the document oddly.