esprehn

一昨日議論

GKE uses spanner (with an etcd API layer) per the docs.

https://docs.cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concept...

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes...

esprehn

4 日前議論

GitHub and LinkedIn both appear to be pretty successful businesses.

esprehn

5 日前議論

Is Xbox really worse than Play-Station?

It's a pretty good name actually because it's unique, easy to Google, and is never ambiguous in conversation. It's all the suffixes that made a mess of it.

esprehn

8 日前議論

Yahoo. They very nearly bought Google too, but refused the initial $1m offer and then bid too low the second time. Kind of hilarious to see how that played out over time.

  Yahoo had two failed attempts to acquire Google; in 1998, Larry Page and Sergey Brin approached Yahoo to sell their nascent search engine for $1 million, but Yahoo declined the offer.[37][38]

  In 2002, when Terry Semel entered into negotiations to purchase Google. Google was reportedly seeking a price of $5 billion. After weeks of negotiation, Yahoo's final offer was $3 billion, a figure that Google's leadership rejected, leading them to terminate the deal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo

esprehn

21 日前議論

The good part about a language runtime is there's a massive corpus of tests that are in that language and agnostic to the implementation language.

For a JS engine that's Test 262: https://github.com/tc39/test262

For node that's its unit tests which are mostly JS: https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/main/test

Node also runs the web platform tests too: https://web-platform-tests.org/

Bun has a similar large corpus of JS/TS tests: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/main/test

You're right about general purpose rewrites, but language runtimes are a lot easier.

esprehn

22 日前議論

Apple was doing effectively everything on that list, though the self driving car was cancelled and the AI is now gemini.

esprehn

25 日前議論

Is the simpler thing not Lambda/Cloud Run (with terraform)?

On the application developer side k8s is awesome fo, but the you look inside the box and it melts your face off.

I'm not sure a middle ground exists unfortunately. It's either full service like Lambda or bag of knives like k8s.

esprehn

30 日前議論

I assume they meant the Attention process in LLMs, not the human concept of paying attention:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_(machine_learning)

esprehn

2 か月前議論

One big difference seems to be Mastra has tests and this project doesn't.

esprehn

2 か月前議論

It also can't inherit css variables which is unfortunate since it means the image doesn't respect the theme.

esprehn

2 か月前議論

They totally could sanitize it, just like they did with the gadget proxy, they just choose not to fix this ancient request.

It's like my ticket to add data url support to sheets. It just gets punted year after year.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

There's a whole movie about a snail that's super fast (Turbo). An adult version of that isn't so far fetched.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

Yes, I was around during the original discussions. AbortSignal exists because TC39 was taking too long and cancelling fetch() is table stakes for a networking oriented platform like the web.

Those threads are a good example of what's wrong in TC39. A simple AbortSignal could have been added, but by the time it's reconciled with SES, large speculative APIs like Governers, or the original attempt to add a parallel throw mechanism just for cancellation, nothing actually gets done.

It's been 10 years since CancelToken was first discussed and we're still debating it.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

I just can't help but imagine those long lived rats escaping and taking over our cities. We already struggle with the rat population and they only live 3 years, imagine if they lived 15.

Also I love rats and totally agree they're tough pets because they don't live long enough. We had many of them growing up and spent a fortune removing tumors.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

AbortSignal is same thing on the Web. It's unfortunate TC39 failed to ever bring a CancelToken to the language to standardize the pattern outside browsers.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

The proposal already exists [1], but vendors would need to agree to both prioritize and ship it.

Right now Chrome is much more focused on AI related APIs (sigh) and not stuff like FontMetrics.

[1] https://drafts.css-houdini.org/font-metrics-api-1/

esprehn

3 か月前議論

The FontMetrics API solves this, hopefully browsers will ship it someday.

https://drafts.css-houdini.org/font-metrics-api-1/

RIP eae@.

esprehn

3 か月前議論

It can request with a JS call. It can't passively collect it without you approving first. The article is written like calling that JS function will turn on location tracking without consent.

esprehn

4 か月前議論

This is very cool, but I'm confused why the React player is smaller than the HTML player. What's actually in the size comparison there?

esprehn

4 か月前議論

The worker situation would be much better with inline workers (or modules).

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-module-declarations

Unfortunately the JS standards folks have refused so far to make this situation better.

Ex. it should just be `new Worker(module { ... })`.

投稿

[untitled]

コメント