HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

eudamoniac

274 カルマ登録 7 か月前

投稿

Squats, Presses, and Deadlifts: Why Gyms Don't Teach the Only Exercises You Need

startingstrength.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·先月·0 コメント

Ask HN: What can I read to learn about ADHD?

4 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·3 か月前·2 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·3 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·4 か月前·0 コメント

Metaprogramming in Jai [video]

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·5 か月前·1 コメント

Claude Code TUI is "a small game engine"

twitter.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 eudamoniac·6 か月前·2 コメント

コメント

eudamoniac
·21 時間前·議論
Both of the other comments attached to this post are Vitalize employees pretending to be interested. Pretty cringe
eudamoniac
·昨日·議論
You are the one who said all education should be free and you're also the one arguing for change. I already answered why this is a value judgment. Because money.
eudamoniac
·昨日·議論
My front end interview question is "ping this api and display the response on the page. Add a button to ping again and replace the data on the page with the new response."

This filters out approximately 80% of "Front End Engineers" in their framework of choice.
eudamoniac
·昨日·議論
I apply to the salary. If I get a callback then I'll see what the company does.
eudamoniac
·昨日·議論
You're going to have to make an argument for why the taxpayer needs to pay for every citizen to take art history beyond "it's valuable". Okay, but $20,000 is also valuable and there are opportunity costs.
eudamoniac
·昨日·議論
No, I understand the point of it, I just don't think it is worth the tens of thousands per person that it would cost to do it. I could accept a value argument for free university education in some form, but that form would not be for gradeless/credentialless unproductive studies.

And it's not just that it would cost a lot, it's that it would cost a lot and a motivated person can already do a 90% job of it for free on their own.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
Anecdotally I have a lot of gut problems and I did an experiment where I ate kimchi, kombucha, and kefir in fairly large quantities every day for awhile and nothing changed. I also eat healthily otherwise...
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
Free education and no grades with no business purpose already exists; it's called learning about things that interest you on your own time. I don't see why the taxpayer needs to pay for someone to do this.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
Improve at the ability to read, understand, and digest higher literature.

I am in complete agreement with you that 99% of books are crap. It's the 1% that you hopefully want to get around to reading, and those are typically not the easiest reads.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
The effect is so variable that the reference range is nigh meaningless. Some people feel great at 300ng/dL. Some people experience genuine low-T symptoms at 650 that are fixed by bumping it to 1000. Some people are naturally over 1000 and have otherwise average hormonal profile (hair growth, muscle growth).

Also, the reference range is defined by an age span that is too wide to be useful, something like 21-59. The reference range is completely meaningless for a 25 year old man. Also the level varies drastically throughout days and weeks, so that one test is not a useful indicator of anything unless it's off the charts.

Basically, if you have low-T symptoms you should probably just get on T regardless of what number the test says. Find a doctor who agrees.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
But it's also important to realize that it is "doing it bad" if you are hoping to run a 4 minute mile but your only training is slowly walking around the block forever. At some point you have to seek out more substantial books. You can't just continually read pulp fiction and think you're going to improve at anything; you have to progress.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
I would like to argue against the common opinion that Reading Is Good. I don't believe that reading pulp is good in any way. I don't believe that reading an airport novel is any better than watching TV.

Books have the potential to better the mind, but they don't do so simply by being written words. The books must be of a certain artistic caliber. The push to get people reading in general cannot be the end goal. The end goal is to get people to read quality books, to better the mind, affirm life, practice empathy, experience pathos, feel the grace of God. Too many forget this is the end goal and just think reading words on paper is somehow intrinsically a noble endeavor.

I think the common advice to get people into books is wrong and misses the point. "Find a fun trashy book and just read it" is maybe not productive advice unless attention rehabilitation is needed. Sure, some of those people might eventually stumble upon a good book, but advice can be much more efficient than that.

Here's what I would recommend to a burgeoning reader: There are many easy and fun books that have artistic merit; read those. Find them via Booktok lists from pretentious looking people, or common school reading lists, or wherever; generally only read things you have heard of or that you saw on a list somewhere; don't randomly pick off the shelf. Teenager classics like 1984, Book of the New Sun, Kafka on the Shore, American Psycho, Lord of the Rings are fun and easy reads that have meat on the bone. Ignore the airport novel and anything published recently. The average book has the same lack of value as the average TV show, just less entertaining, more boring, and more effortful to experience. Why would you waste time and effort consuming boring, less entertaining media when the phone and the TV are right there? But when you find good books, there is no replacement; you are doing an entirely different thing than mindlessly entertaining yourself. That is what we're trying to do.
eudamoniac
·一昨日·議論
It's like doing a jigsaw puzzle. The fun part is the doing. I don't really care what the final picture is, and once it's assembled the fun is over.
eudamoniac
·3 日前·議論
You don't have to exclude empathy, but I said it is "a charity-empathy business" and you called that "a sad comment to read" and added that you get a lot of value. That would strongly imply that you disagree with my characterization and/or you get a lot of non-charity-empathy value. That then leads to me asking what that value is.

Personally none of those things you listed are what I want when buying a book, except knockoff protection, but thank you for answering.
eudamoniac
·3 日前·議論
What is the value you find excluding charity or empathy feelings?
eudamoniac
·3 日前·議論
But they are not offering anything worth patronizing. There's no value proposition. The prices are higher, getting the book takes longer, they don't ship it to me, and they never have a good book in stock. Independent book stores exist entirely as a charity-empathy business. They only exist because people feel bad about not shopping there.
eudamoniac
·4 日前·議論
Could you explain what "Oklo requires remote employees to travel to headquarters (Santa Clara, CA) twice a quarter annually" means? Does this mean 8x per year or twice per year?
eudamoniac
·4 日前·議論
Your CEO asked for my Linkedin about a month ago after applying ("Do you have a LinkedIn profile with 100+ connections you can share with us?") and then ghosted me after I provided it and multiple follow up emails. The account does have 100+ connections. What's up with that?
eudamoniac
·4 日前·議論
FYI I applied to this a month ago with 11 years of 'Front-End / Full stack Engineer' experience, almost all of which was React and/or Typescript, and got no response
eudamoniac
·5 日前·議論
I have around 1200 ebooks in Calibre; around 300 I downloaded on purpose and the rest came in large batches. I have these two groups separated out. I'm pretty sure I've never read one from the batch group that was close to good. The vast majority of books are crap and if you pick at random you're going to pick crap.

Most of my batch books are from Standard Ebooks which, while a noble project, has a serious addiction to publishing dreck no one should waste time reading.