HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

falcor84

7,999 カルマ登録 13 年前
falcor84 gmail.com

投稿

Securing the Future of AI Agents

deepmind.google
14 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·23 日前·4 コメント

OpenClaw leads official ARC-AGI-3 community leaderboard

arcprize.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·2 か月前·0 コメント

You Can Soon Buy a $4,370 Humanoid Robot [Unitree R1] on AliExpress

wired.com
12 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·3 か月前·2 コメント

Get ready for takeoff with Uber and Joby

uber.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·4 か月前·0 コメント

AI-Assisted Software Architecture: Generating the C4 Model and Views from Code

workingsoftware.dev
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·5 か月前·0 コメント

A New Computer Could Replace Electricity with Light

popularmechanics.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·5 か月前·1 コメント

Amazon to Cut 16,000 Jobs in Latest Round of Layoffs

nytimes.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·5 か月前·0 コメント

'Star Wars' Boss [Kathleen Kennedy] Departs, Ending an Asteroid-Filled Reign

nytimes.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·6 か月前·2 コメント

US gives green light to Nvidia H200 chip exports to China

reuters.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·6 か月前·0 コメント

NASA considers evacuating ailing crew member from International Space Station

arstechnica.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·6 か月前·0 コメント

CodeClash

codeclash.ai
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·7 か月前·0 コメント

Can We Stop Our Digital Selves from Becoming Who We Are?

nytimes.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·7 か月前·0 コメント

Terminal-Bench 2.0 and Harbor

tbench.ai
1 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·8 か月前·1 コメント

An AI company CEO could take over the world

blog.ai-futures.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·8 か月前·0 コメント

Microsoft, OpenAI reach new deal to allow OpenAI to restructure

reuters.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·9 か月前·1 コメント

President Trump Renews Threat of 100% Tariffs on Films Made Outside the U.S.

variety.com
10 ポイント·投稿者 falcor84·9 か月前·9 コメント

コメント

falcor84
·一昨日·議論
Not the parent, but I just checked and it seems that all $iwords.com are taken for i<18
falcor84
·3 日前·議論
Why not both?
falcor84
·3 日前·議論
I promise that I did, and I did not find that; you said that it's "nothing like" but then the rest of it seems to match what I was saying in my analogy. Would you mind please saying more about the difference you see between our opinions?
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
It sounds like you're fully agreeing with me that it has pretty much nothing to do with the value of the employees and essentially everything with how the employees no longer fit the company's plans.
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
> Yet today, Microsoft/XBOX decided half the team was deemed USELESS and needed to be let go

I feel that this is an incredibly unfair and demeaning take both towards Microsoft and towards the people being fired. As I see it, getting fired is just like being dumped by a romantic partner. It typically says very little about your value as an individual, and almost everything about their current situation and how the relationship with you fits into their future plans and the other opportunities available to them.
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
Yeah, I never got Minority Report's focus on punishment. If it was a crime of passion that was prevented and will non be attempted again (according to their predictive powers) why is a punishment needed?
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
> How will they achieve cleaner code, with fewer workers?

What do you mean? My experience has always been that the more cooks there are in the kitchen, the messier the codebase is. Has yours been different?
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
> Death Stranding is only a game by the narrowest of margins

I strongly disagree. I'd say that Death Stranding has an incredible open world "sandbox", rivaling the ones of GTA. I can spend dozens of hours there without worrying about the campaign - it's not a Hollywood movie.
falcor84
·4 日前·議論
Makes perfect sense. It's like in that story about how Bertrand Russell claimed that when you accept a single falsehood, you can prove anything at all. As I recall it, he was then challenged - "let's say 1=0, prove that you're the Pope" and he quickly responded that if 1=0, then after adding 1, you have 2=1, and thus if the Pope and he are 2 people, that means they are 1 person.
falcor84
·5 日前·議論
I didn't get why they mentioned that one specifically. Is there any particular relationship between Blueprint-bench and Vendor-bench?
falcor84
·8 日前·議論
Well, for better or worse, markets are becoming increasingly dominated by "non-biological utility maximizers" - mostly hft bots, but now also llm-based reasoning agents.
falcor84
·9 日前·議論
This has little to do with shareable links and everything to do with the trust you put in whoever you share it with.

There's not much difference between them ctrl+v-ing the link to a third party, vs them ctrl+a, ctrl+c, ctrl+v-ing the contents to another party. If anything, by just sharing a link, you have a chance to disable the sharing and hope the content hasn't yet been copied.
falcor84
·10 日前·議論
It's absolutely possible for individual employees to have generous vacations, while at the same time maintaining a continuously staffed support function.
falcor84
·10 日前·議論
Thanks for the examples. I actually kinda like it, as almost being a form of spoken word poetry; but yes, these lists do seem unusual on a second read-through.
falcor84
·10 日前·議論
I'm not sure what you mean. I can't find a single prominent contributor to transformers who doesn't have a CS background. The closest I found is Jared Kaplan (math and theoretical physics), who came and contributed with mathematical analysis after the architecture was already well-defined.
falcor84
·10 日前·議論
>Loop engineering” is a hot buzzphrase after mentions of it by Boris Cherny (Claude Code’s creator) and Peter Steinberger (OpenClaw's creator) went viral on social media.

Just adding that context here.

At a WorkOS event discussion on the 2nd of June, Boris Cherny said:

> I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running. They're the ones that are prompting Claude and figuring out what to do. My job is to write loops.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RkQQ7WEor7w&time_continue=704

This is then Peter Steinberger's tweet on the 7th of June:

> Here’s your monthly reminder that you shouldn’t be prompting coding agents anymore. You should be designing loops that prompt your agents.

and the immediate response from Gautham Pai:

> Oh god, LinkedIn will now start a new fad, "Loop Engineering". Harness Engineering is so last year. Loop Engineering is what you should be doing.

https://xcancel.com/steipete/status/2063697162748260627

And then Addy Osmani quickly wrote a post about it on the day which triggered a discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48514387

And there was another interesting discussion here about Armin Rochar's more critical take on loops a few days ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643180
falcor84
·11 日前·議論
There's a lot that could be said against agentic programming, but I don't understand how it wipes away anyway about CS - everything about this is a massive tower built on top of (and effectively utilizing) everything that we've learned about CS fundamentals and engineering over these decades.
falcor84
·11 日前·議論
Your comment would've been more valuable if you actually included at least one actual example of evidence.
falcor84
·12 日前·議論
Another example of Analog Virtual is Hokusai's The Great Wave (and similar prints). I recently watched David Bull's videos about his recreation of it [0] and it was fascinating to hear him tell about how even the "original" prints were made from slightly different woodblocks made in the same workshop.

[0] https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLK-Wicsj5rAasS2g7e-Z9eFUd...
falcor84
·12 日前·議論
Phoenixing considered harmful