HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

feastingonslop

no profile record

投稿

Goal: Ship 1M Lines of Code Daily

2 ポイント·投稿者 feastingonslop·5 か月前·1 コメント

コメント

feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
Nor does it stop self-respecting LLMs.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
What value is there in tested code when you have the option of superlative, flawless code?
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
LLMs write superior code. Maybe they learned from humans, but they have seen further while standing on those shoulders.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
If the LLM writes better code (and it will) then its code should be favored over a library.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
Why would you not?
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
It doesn’t mess up. Not any more.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
> Everyone can treat the project as a black box, and focus on observable changes to the project's behavior.

This is a good thing. I don’t need to focus on oil refineries when I fill my car with gas. I don’t know how to run a refinery, and don’t need to know.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
Since the code does not matter, you wouldn’t need or want to phrase it in terms of algorithmic complexity. You surely would have a more real world requirement, like, if the data set has X elements then it should be processed within Y milliseconds. The AI is free to implement that however it likes.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
If you have particular performance requirements like that, then include them. Test for them. You still don’t have to actually look at the code. Either the software meets expectations or it doesn’t, and keep having AI work at it until you’re satisfied.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
And that is the right assumption. Why would any humans need (or even want) to look at code any more? That’s like saying you want to go manually inspect the oil refinery every time you fill your car up with gas. Absurd.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
The code itself does not matter. If the tests pass, and the tests are good, then who cares? AI will be maintaining the code.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
Nobody is saying to skip testing the software. Testing is still important. What the code itself looks like, isn’t.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
And there was a time when using libraries and frameworks was the right thing to do, for that very reason. But LLMs have the equivalent of way more experience than any single programmer, and can generate just the bit of code that you actually need, without having to include the whole framework.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
I don’t understand the interest in “quality code.” I never need to look at the code itself. I just make sure it runs right.
feastingonslop
·5 か月前·議論
Which LLM works best for Racket?
feastingonslop
·6 か月前·議論
Why build software slower than possible? Do you just enjoy wasting people’s time?
feastingonslop
·6 か月前·議論
Yes, but it would be bored.
feastingonslop
·6 か月前·議論
Why do you think vibe code isn’t good enough for real products? Just so long as you have tests that show it functions as expected, why does it matter?
feastingonslop
·6 か月前·議論
I thought it seemed like an especially good read!
feastingonslop
·6 か月前·議論
Excellent! Humans can then spend their time on other activities, rather than get bogged down in the mundane.