HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

fnfjfk

no profile record

コメント

fnfjfk
·昨年·議論
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift
fnfjfk
·昨年·議論
They are working on that, well... kind of. They somehow convinced the NYC government to allow them to legally operate little trucks in bike lanes. They claim that they are "bikes" (bikes have two wheels, that's what "bi" means, these have four)

https://www.reddit.com/r/NYCbike/comments/1gw1wlj/amazon_box...
fnfjfk
·昨年·議論
You could technically footjam, just need to show the kids enough BMX or fixed gear videos first...
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
Why should everyone pay equally, rather than people that currently store their private property for free on public land in some of the most expensive real estate in the country?
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
16% of six-figure earners is the really shocking part here. They make 100k and don’t have a 401k or IRA? What?! How?!
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
Ah TF1, TF2 (err... hmm... that's something else) had a normal campaign, and a very very good one at that.
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
They're complaining about developing software for Google platforms, not working at Google. The platform will get dropped because it no longer has the opportunity to fuel more L6 promos.

I think the obvious notable exception is Android, which is not going anywhere and which now has a fairly delightful development experience with Kotlin and Compose.
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
Are you in New York, or are cops crushing candy all day instead of actually doing anything useful a nationwide problem?
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
Yes maps.me
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
I’ve used this app as an offline maps tool for travel for a long time, when I got it I thought it was just a fine OSM client.

Then years later I hear it was running crypto nonsense (what) and was involved in FTX (what), but out of laziness I’m still using the thing because it can’t do any upsells when I am offline anyways.

Any recommendations for a good iOS offline map app that’s just a map app?
fnfjfk
·2 年前·議論
“Unlimited” means there is no limit, so logically it means a few months should be fine. If a few months not fine, I think a reasonable request would be to define the limit and claim that instead of “unlimited”.

I work at place with about 5 work weeks off, which is a lot for the US, and there’s never any question about whether you can use your time or not because the number of days is exactly specified. I like that better than a vague “unlimited” (but not actually) policy.