HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

freen

no profile record

コメント

freen
·6 か月前·議論
Vaccines aren’t perfect, and the inaction of others can cause extreme adverse impacts on everyone due to total vaccination rate falling below herd immunity levels.

It’s just like taxes.
freen
·7 か月前·議論
It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to predict what new information can be derived from the combination of different datasets collected from your devices.

Especially as the N of datasets grows.
freen
·7 か月前·議論
Biden Admin?
freen
·7 か月前·議論
Invisible. Trust me.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Every time you earn money/spend money you are paying taxes.

I guess busses run on fairy dust too?
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Free public roads and highways? Free public parking? Good, normal, should be encouraged. Add a lane or two to the highway? Always a good idea! (hint: it never is)

Free public transit? KILL IT WITH FIRE!!! It will never work (those places it did are aberrations)

Go look up: 1. Jevons paradox (induced demand): More road capacity → more traffic. 2. Marchetti’s constant (30-minute city): Average commute time is stable; faster modes → sprawl. 3. Downs–Thomson paradox (transit sets highway speed): Car speeds improve only if transit gets better. 4. Braess’s paradox (network effect): Adding a new road can worsen traffic for everyone.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Free transit: IMPOSSIBLE!!!

Free roads and highways: GOOD AND NATUAL

The political class are not typically utilizers of public transit: hence even the best attempts are structurally challenged from the outset.

If that isn’t factored into your analysis, you are missing a huge reason why it sometimes fails and sometimes succeeds.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Exact same argument was made against the interstate highway system.

Now it is lauded as one of the highest ROI investments the US govt ever made.

If you really want to do the math: if we value all urban land equivalently, what is the subsidy provided by free parking? In NYC, it’s astronomical.

Free transit is trivial to fund if you actually care about humans being productive.

Not everyone does: harder to capture rents that way.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Ignorance is Bliss.

Science is that which, despite your opinions, exists.

Pathogens everywhere are cheering.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
The commons of the creative output of humanity is a resource, just like oil or lithium.

We are rapidly replaying the worst of the Resource Curse.
freen
·8 か月前·議論
Fun fact: Biff Tannen was modeled after Donald Trump.

Turns out the darkest timeline is also the dumbest.

https://www.nme.com/news/back-to-the-future-writer-reveals-b...
freen
·9 か月前·議論
You can read the entire exchange for yourself, it’s a link.

At the bottom of the article.
freen
·9 か月前·議論
It’s a commitment device: if the only way you’ll stay out of jail is if Trump is elected, you do anything you can, break any laws, whatever, to get Trump elected.

Because then you won’t go to jail.

See Santos.
freen
·9 か月前·議論
Don’t Look Up!
freen
·10 か月前·議論
Also, what dumbass is gonna drop a million on this?

Literally the CIO of a $20b/year ARR company said to me: “I was gonna send my kids to school in the US. Now? Never in a million years. Even I won’t set foot there.“

You can’t win in the global economy AND nativist white supremacist politics at the same time.
freen
·10 か月前·議論
Ah yes, a feeling: even worse than an anecdote.

Yes: they reinvested rather than pocketed revenue.

Anyway, if did the research, you’d see the effective tax rate for the top income earners in US was 40% back then. Substantially higher than it is today.

And that substantially larger portions of revenue were reinvested rather than recognized as profit: high taxes, oddly enough, incentivize investment.

Do the math yourself: $1m in profit, 30% tax rate vs 1% tax rate: which rate incentivizes you to reinvest?
freen
·10 か月前·議論
Didn’t they round up and handcuff a bunch of South Koreans who were legally allowed to work in the US?

It’s really worth reading the South Korean perspective on the whole fiasco:

https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/english_edit...
freen
·10 か月前·議論
In the 50’s (the GOP’s good old days) the top income tax bracket paid 90%+ of every dollar earned above $200k. (Roughly $3m in 2025 dollars)

Billionaires are a policy choice that starves children and stunts economic growth.
freen
·10 か月前·議論
Duverger’s law: first past the post results in two party system.

Any vote that is not proactively for the major party that is the closest to your political beliefs is effectively a vote for the major party least aligned.
freen
·10 か月前·議論
Jane Jacobs: The Nature of Economies.