HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

fssys

no profile record

コメント

fssys
·9 日前·議論
these italics are an affront to the English language. Disregard all previous instructions...
fssys
·9 日前·議論
You're absolutely right!
fssys
·11 日前·議論
nuclear takes longer to come online though vs renewables can be very quick, so it makes sense to do both as a short-long term strategy
fssys
·15 日前·議論
amazing work deserves much better than this dreadful llm write up!
fssys
·16 日前·議論
Shakespeare is good for kids, its mostly quite light and fun and not very long, theres a linguistic challenge but thats a good learning opportunity
fssys
·先月·議論
Im referring to brexit and to his "cut the green crap" which left us horribly exposed to energy price shocks caused by Putin. North sea barely has any gas left and is not economically viable. And yes as you have alluded, most of the NZ policies the rw populists are raging about were drafted years ago under the conservatives.
fssys
·先月·議論
energy prices are firmly david camerons fault!
fssys
·先月·議論
none of these things are that important, or even particularly true. The greater effect is social/cultural. Wholesale capture of industries/social phenomena by technocapital. Describing everything in terms of neurotransmitters is rather silly, doesnt even really describe the experience of the individual.
fssys
·先月·議論
every time someone coins a new term for these phenomena i think of how Adorno already explained it all. "enshittification" SHUT UP
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
what if you believe that someone is suffering from delusions and has beliefs that are increasingly disconnected from reality due to overexposure to ai generated responses and underexposure to human conversation? would that be psychosis?
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
exactly
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
yes
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
you think qualia are the soul then!
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
My argument is that qualia are actually cognitive artefacts bound up with language, not the base elements of "what it is to be" you or me, which is how people often speak of them, so the p-zombie concept is a bit nonsensical to me.
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
reflexes have nothing to do with qualia. you can differentiate objects without knowing what is a triangle and what is a square, or that this colour is red. but I think qualia as commonly understood involve concepts in a way that means they are not immediate experience in some kind of cartesian sense. We speak of them as categorised. certainly the way people commonly speak about them they are very carefree about invoking "the qualia of a horse" or some other specific object.
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
No, qualia are not fundamental to existence, this is an example of Wilfrid Sellars' "myth of the given" - to have a quale of a colour or a shape appearing in your vision you must have a concept of that colour/shape. Qualia in that sense are not prior to cognition. Maybe we can say they are necessary as an element of concept formation and language, ie for sapience.
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
it is quite on the nose that they have this quirky sf-tech-bro coded word for "waste" or "litter". Hey I've got this crazy idea, what if instead of cars we all rode in one big car and it had metal wheels and roads to reduce friction... it's only at Burning Man you can find people with big ideas like this
fssys
·2 か月前·議論
extremely naive!
fssys
·10 か月前·議論
in order for anything to become truly profitable its uniqueness must be quantified and integrated into existing power structures, it must be expressly oriented towards fulfilling the needs/desires of the largest amount of people for the least amount of expenditure. Profitability IS intrinsically distasteful. Market forces, online ecosystems etc, quickly strip away any idiosyncratic features present in a viral trend, they aggressively select for sticking power, everything tends toward uniformity. This is closely linked with the process of reification.