gaze

no profile record

コメント

15 日前議論

I've noticed that tech people will respond to an encroachment on civil rights with a technological alternative. I think this is a mistake, because the excuse is presented in bad faith, and to present an alternative is to accept their framing. The correct response is something to the effect of "I know what you're trying to do, fuck off."

18 日前議論

with sufficiently many public/private partnerships, what's the difference?

23 日前議論

I'm super curious what alexia massalin is up to these days, besides collecting microunity patent royalties

2 か月前議論

For superconducting qubits, yes. For other architectures everyone is doing their own thing.

2 か月前議論

I think that's the datacenter with the gas turbine generators that operate without permits because they're "portable." Data centers have tremendous externalities but colossus is a particularly nasty offender, and not just due its size.

Edit: They did it with Colossus and now they're doing the exact same thing with Colossus2. https://www.selc.org/news/xai-built-an-illegal-power-plant-t...

3 か月前議論

sure but it seems spiritually wrong to use an LLM to debug a slop paper. Who knows, maybe claude generated it in the first place?

3 か月前議論

the irritating thing about LLM generated papers like these is that they're wrong but are generated using LLMs that are capable enough to bury the absurd claim pretty deep in there.

3 か月前議論

this paper looks AI generated to me... I mean, there's no experiments to go along with it.

3 か月前議論

see terry pratchett's boots theory of economic fairness. They'll get into the market with something that costs more long term...

3 か月前議論

I mean I get your argument but it feels like one should adjust for wage growth instead. One labor unit of value converts to a shittier backpack.

3 か月前議論

for making research grade devices you barely need a cleanroom

3 か月前議論

You just need unitarity.

3 か月前議論

There are NO alternatives. There's nothing else that stays liquid at 4 K and absolutely nothing else comes close.

5 か月前議論

2d materials are so awful to work with but keep yielding these stunningly beautiful results so physicists must persist.

5 か月前議論

Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will

7 か月前議論

The power of quantum computing is constructing the solution to a problem out of an interference pattern. Classical probabilities don’t interfere, but quantum probabilities do. Loosely, quantum probabilities can be constructed to cancel, since their amplitudes can be negative.

Shor’s algorithm works on the quantum Fourier transform. The quantum Fourier transform works because you can pick a frequency out of a signal using a “test wave.” The test wave can select out the amplitude of interest because the information of the test wave constructively interferes, whereas every other frequency cancels. This is the interference effect that can only happen with complex/negative probability amplitudes.

7 か月前議論

The communication here is clear as mud. WHICH quantum systems? D-Wave? We know D-Wave is a joke!

8 か月前議論

I have a 556 and 547 that I still use. They work fine. They slowed down a bit from the resistors drifting but whatever. Still very fun to use and they heat the workspace in the winter.

8 か月前議論

What's your objection to the tax increase. I think people are talking about it plenty and it seems generally non-objectionable.

8 か月前議論

doom and gloom over the promise of free busses is a wild level of cynicism