gilcot

no profile record

·5 か月前·議論

Another loser here to second you

·5 か月前·議論

And that’s not true! He did want to keep the editor stable and available for many platforms and compatible with vi. Rejected proposals break one of these rules.

gilcot

·5 か月前·議論

do you mean http://cream.sourceforge.net/

gilcot

·5 か月前·議論

Merci.

gilcot

·5 か月前·議論

I loved using it to write and browse my html files. It can do troff too <3

gilcot

·7 か月前·議論

No, the editor is "ex" (for extended ed…) and "vi" is it's other face… (when you call vi, it’s same as calling ex then issuing :visual command…)

gilcot

·7 か月前·議論

And they're "codenames" not supposed to be as obvious as names…

gilcot

·7 か月前·議論

That's because "ed" was the "editor" (and that later was abbreviated "ed"…) when sed born.

gilcot

·7 か月前·議論

As unique as: Go, Python, R, Rust, Word, Writer, --"

gilcot

·7 か月前·議論

And before the rise of heavy IDE, you need some coffee to write all those SomeObscureWord.longLongStuf.notSoShortOne.LastSentence()

gilcot

·9 か月前·議論

Do you mean doas ?

gilcot

·3 年前·議論

You were a github consumer.

You are now a git user.

gilcot

·3 年前·議論

You're supposed to write things like `\chapter{the title}` (so focusing on the content) instead of dealing with: font family/size/weight/variant/shape, text color/flushing/decoration, you know all those formatting you're always playing with with text editors for example.

gilcot

·3 年前·議論

And so will be in next century.

コメント