HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

groundzeros2015

840 カルマ登録 9 か月前

コメント

groundzeros2015
·14 分前·議論
James Cameron claims it’s real. But I think that doesn’t exclude filming slow and speeding up later.
groundzeros2015
·15 時間前·議論
Rust itself has CVEs. Which projects are you referring to?
groundzeros2015
·15 時間前·議論
Security is a complex topic for which rust is not a magic wand. Rust itself has CVEs.

Which project are you referring to? Yes not every open source project uses memory tools.
groundzeros2015
·18 時間前·議論
I think tech people spend hundreds on tech because it’s fun.
groundzeros2015
·18 時間前·議論
This is actually a great point I have not seen articulated. A motivation for clear architecture and good design is being able to evolve the system over time. Does LLM code have that capacity? Are LLMs themselves able to increment iteratively?
groundzeros2015
·18 時間前·議論
C programmer have learned how to deal with memory problems and have whole suites of tools for finding them.

Is it cheaper to find them at compile time rather than runtime? Yes.

But it’s not an unsolved problem. Memory bugs are a known unknown.
groundzeros2015
·18 時間前·議論
I don’t think that’s true.
groundzeros2015
·18 時間前·議論
They have the source right in front of them.
groundzeros2015
·一昨日·議論
It’s just a PR article to promote alternative
groundzeros2015
·一昨日·議論
What? How can it possibly talk about the decision without the risks? It doesn’t even refer to a source where I can learn more.

Did you ask the LLM about your claim that no level was safe?
groundzeros2015
·一昨日·議論
I agree. And so when we make up or transfer numbers in a database it has real world impact.
groundzeros2015
·一昨日·議論
Indeed. Your rail was being subsidized.
groundzeros2015
·一昨日·議論
> the safe level is zero.

This is not true of any substance.

> Well it is scary and harmful

Well that narrative certainly came through. The facts supporting it did not.

> Do you work for the chemical industry?

No. Do you? Does this invalidate that the article did not use the opportunity to inform me?
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
And the ideal consumer takes everything and pays nothing. Let’s see where they meet!
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
That number that you don’t think is real lets you claim actual resources now and in the future.

I think you should equally be confused about abstractions such as university credentials, or citizenship.
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
Indeed. And according to MMT what that does is claim economic output for the government (work resources etc), without direct taxation.
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
People literally work their lives for that representation. It’s not the value itself but it’s a way to store and transfer certain kinds of value.
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
Bit flips in a database = years of people’s labor and planning
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
The article fails to mention risk and the amounts that create those. In typical journalist fashion it just emphasizes the word “chemical” and other scary framings.
groundzeros2015
·3 日前·議論
> You don’t get next day prime except in a relatively small proportion of the country

I agree that the cost or level of service differs (it literally costs more to serve you).