HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

hackernews777

no profile record

コメント

hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
It's not actually needed, its simply a convenience for users who just want it to work out of the box. You can hand configure the bootstrapping process with -connect and -addnode if you wish.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
You realize this isn't just a 200K programmer problem ? People getting paid 60K to do IT support (or other support for various operations systems) also get roped into the same exact on-call duty. (Often this not advertised either...) It's growing problem from penny pinching tech companies that want to tout 24/7 support without paying for 24/7 support.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
The other half of that is Disagree and Commit. (https://www.amazon.jobs/en/principles) The concept being that supposedly everyone is free to make their best case for a course of action, but once a decision has been made everyone is expected to fully commit to the decision.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
I thought he was referring to the fact you don't have to be particularly clever or competent person to keep your job. Amazon isn't known for firing people on the spot for honest mistakes (CoE gets filed and life goes on). It's usually more along the lines of people are not doing the work they were assigned to do.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
A person would be wise to not admit working for a company when their comments go against company policy on public comments.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
> "FAANG" companies that OP mentions have a smug sense of superiority.

I think it is the opposite.

No one is going to fire you over shipping a kludge or low quality software, especially when you document why it is the case. People get themselves into trouble by getting emotionally invested in their work and avoiding the task at hand. If someone gives you an idiotic task at Amazon, give them an idiotic solution. You are right though, if you want purpose and real meaning behind your work seek it out elsewhere.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
Making some sort of harassment with a racial component that's on par with sexual harassment. Despite all the DEI policies and whatever, the baseline for termination is pretty much the same as most employers, off color remarks are not getting you fired but putting down a fellow employee certainly can.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
If you got fired over this it's highly likely you said something pretty bad. The only times I have seen anyone get instafired at Amazon is when they have done something that could be deemed as harassment. (eg. making sexual or racial advancements towards a direct report) Anybody else who gets fired for performance reasons knows they are thin ice for a long time.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
> This is Amazon/Bezos' fault, not the driver's.

Agree.

> Things like this are going to keep happening and keep getting worse until the middle class/upper middle class realizes that our current lifestyle and access to "cheap" services is being held up by a systematically abused and underpaid labor force that isn't given the time, compensation, respect, or basic decency to support doing a good job.

Disagree. This is entirely the fault of yes-men/pie in the sky management at Amazon. Any manager with the slightest bit of autonomy at Amazon is making six figures and is willing to throw their employees under the bus for money. They will do literally anything to avoid admitting that a problem that exists that can be solved but will cause a KPI to go down. Absolutely no one is willing to go to bat for ideas that cause temporary productivity decrease but a quality and productivity increase over the long run as the company gets better at solving the problem.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
No it doesn't track with human existence. In the past such things lead to wars and large schisms in societies, it is completely abnormal for the vast majority of anything to be negative and the prevailing wisdom be just grin and bear it.

The USA was founded on the idea of negative rights and an opt in culture, instead today we increasingly see a shift to people demanding positive rights and putting the burden on the individual to opt out. In the future I could totally see a market to have a robot buddy follow you around and have responses ready for all the things people want to pester you with.
hackernews777
·5 年前·議論
It is a chore to open your mouth. A person shouldn't be subject to being prepared to engage in a 100 different conversations for the crime of walking outside their house. It also doesn't help that the vast majority of interactions are negative (pan handling, cat calling, sales pitches, political affiliations, religious evangelism, scams, asking for favors / free stuff, bullying, snooping, etc.)