HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

hhjinks

no profile record

コメント

hhjinks
·9 日前·議論
Unironically, image boards are the best. All replies available chronologically, and you can click any post number to follow whatever thread of conversation you find interesting.
hhjinks
·15 日前·議論
Nobody was compared to the nazis, so Godwin's law is not yet relevant in this discussion.
hhjinks
·17 日前·議論
If my job devolves to reviewing AI code, I'm becoming a plumber.
hhjinks
·23 日前·議論
Rewriting code to be more compact is orthogonal to productivity.
hhjinks
·29 日前·議論
Sure there is. They're a Christian, and think any action that causes death directly or indirectly condemns you to hell, and it's not given that you can repent. But scripture says belief in Christ will save your immortal soul, and that God is forgiving and merciful. That is not consistent with OPs views, who puts salvation as a "maybe" if you've caused death. If you find a genuine faith in Christ after the fact, you will be saved.
hhjinks
·29 日前·議論
Sure, I'd say that's a requisite for believing in Christ. But like I said, that belief can be sparked after what seems like any number of transgressions.
hhjinks
·29 日前·議論
I'm certain I could not raise a novel theological perspective on Chrstianity even if I devoted my entire life to it. But from what I can tell, killing is not a black stain that precludes you from salvation. God is good, and He is forgiving.
hhjinks
·29 日前·議論
I thought accepting and believing in Jesus as Lord was all you needed to enter heaven?

John 6:40 (KJV) 40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
hhjinks
·先月·議論
Neither the OP nor you give a reason for why that's bad. I want my child to have all possible advantages in life. I'm sure most people want that. Why shouldn't we select for that? I'm interested in hearing an argument that doesn't go into anti-abortion territory.
hhjinks
·先月·議論
Why not? Minecraft is the second most selling game of all time and comes with a freely distributable and hostable multiplayer component. How would this legislation have stopped that from happening?
hhjinks
·2 か月前·議論
>So now what, you need to show accounts to follow first

Youtube won't show you anything at all if you have a new account with watch history turned off. It says something like "turn on watch history and watch videos so we can recommend some for you".
hhjinks
·2 か月前·議論
The slop machine is stupidly easy to use. Recently switched jobs and got to use Claude Code for the first time. Literally just talk to it. There's nothing to learn.
hhjinks
·3 か月前·議論
How so? We already have digital ID in Norway. How does providing that information to American corporations further Norway's surveillance goals?
hhjinks
·3 か月前·議論
You review code not to verify the actual output of the code, but the code itself. For bugs, for maintainability. Commit hygiene is part of that.
hhjinks
·4 か月前·議論
Have you considered just doing hyposensibilization therapy? No reason to go the way of surgery before trying that. Worked wonders for me and my array of allergies, dust mites among them.
hhjinks
·4 か月前·議論
Prevent pasting comments. Implement a naive check for time spent typing the comment, and shadowban posts that don't pass the criteria. Add a 1 minute wait and captcha for posting.

That'd drastically reduce the amount of low effort posts, both human-written and generated.
hhjinks
·6 か月前·議論
Well, the map obviously does a lot of extrapolation. Look at Norway, for example. The bigger cities pollute the air in a 50km radius? In a country where heating is primarily electric? When Berlin and Paris don't seem to affect the air quality 20km away, despite having ten times the population?
hhjinks
·6 か月前·議論
Which branch your work was done on is noise, not signal. There is absolutely zero signal lost by rebasing, and it prunes a lot of noise. If your branch somehow carries information, that information should be in your commit message.
hhjinks
·7 か月前·議論
How would you measure time going backwards if you can only perceive it going forwards? How can you "experience" everything around you going "backwards" if that includes your memory? How can you determine that a specific moment in time was arrived at by time going forward, or by going backwards?
hhjinks
·7 か月前·議論
>does it make sense to ask how something created after its emission could affect its path

The problem here is likely the concept of "after". It's relativity; what's "after" in our frame of reference isn't after in all frames of reference.