HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

highmastdon

324 カルマ登録 13 年前

コメント

highmastdon
·5 日前·議論
Speak facts. Don't hide behind morality this, care that, environment and virtue signalling... Tell me, what is the factual things Grok model does wrong and is factual incorrect?
highmastdon
·5 日前·議論
1. intelligence to token-use ratio is much better than the frontier models 2. hallucination rate is MUCH lower than OpenAI, Google and Deepseek models 3. the cost for output tokens is much lower than Anthropic models while near same intelligence and task completion 4. task completion time and success is on par with Opus 4.8 Max, but 3.5x less time used

Especially 2. you're probably more willing to allow OpenAI to bankrupt your morality, than face the facts of the model itself

Overall, Grok models are more factual and less politically influenced than OpenAI ones.
highmastdon
·30 日前·議論
I’m using MacParakeet these days. If your language is supported, definitely give it a try. It’s much faster and lower footprint
highmastdon
·3 か月前·議論
[flagged]
highmastdon
·4 か月前·議論
Fyi, your bottom bar with links isn't responsive causing annoying behaviour with horizontal scroll on mobile phone
highmastdon
·6 か月前·議論
Still to this day I don't understand how people manage to do software development on a Windows PC. I started with my first secondhand MacBook which was one before the unibody, and then upgraded to unibody and never have left ever. The only reason I was forced to use Windows was for clients that didn't have support for MacOS or Linux. The only thing I need Windows for is rootkit enabled games... which pains me, otherwise I'd have Linux on my desktop
highmastdon
·7 か月前·議論
I had the feeling that Cerebras only supports smaller modes. Maybe something to do with their hardware arch? I never dove into it. I wanted to use Kimi K2 fast for coding and Groq was the only fast provider at the time
highmastdon
·昨年·議論
The nice thing is that adding this to the basic prompt that cursor uses will advance all those users and directly do away with this problem only to discover the next one. However, all these little things add up to a very powerful prompt where the LLM will make it only easier for anyone to build real stuff that on the surface looks very good
highmastdon
·昨年·議論
Don't underestimate the amount of knowledge you don't have to perfect things. I remember building scheduling software in PHP in high school, because I just fixed problem after problem, and I was not limited by any form of knowledge. If I'd have to do it again, I'd be perfecting the architecture, refactoring everything every other week...
highmastdon
·3 年前·議論
In concept very similar to https://steemit.com/
highmastdon
·9 年前·議論
It's not the same thing, but it triggered something. A programming language related is Koka (see: An overview of Koka: https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/kokaspec.html#sec-an-ov...).

It's basically a functional programming language where functions can be applied to a type. The type is then passed as the first parameter. So instead of `afunction(param1, param2)` you would do `param1.afunction(param2)`.

Example: (https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/kokaspec.html#sec-struc...)

struct person(age: int, name: string)

fun birthday(p: Person) { return p(age = p.age+1) }

val me = Person(27, "Albert") // { age: 27, name: "Albert" }

val meWithBirthday = me.birthday() // { age: 28, name: "Albert" }