HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

hobom

no profile record

コメント

hobom
·3 か月前·議論
They are taking in more than they are spending hosting them. However, the cost for training the next generation of models is not covered.
hobom
·4 か月前·議論
Meta was strongly against the Australian social media ban.
hobom
·4 か月前·議論
Sorry, the "they" referred to the hyperscalers
hobom
·4 か月前·議論
Even more extreme, that might mean they won't be able to offer Claude to non-US companies at all.
hobom
·5 か月前·議論
The article didn't suggest that the video mentioned was AI slop, it correctly recognised it as human generated.
hobom
·5 か月前·議論
[flagged]
hobom
·6 か月前·議論
So the problem IS that people are putting in too much (even if accidentally) ?
hobom
·8 か月前·議論
There are several concrete proposals to regulate AI either proposed or passed. The most recent prominent example of a passed law is California SB53, whose summary you can read here: https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/10/california-sb...
hobom
·8 か月前·議論
Australia's soon-to-take-effect ban affects nine platforms, including Instagram and Facebook, but not HN. These bans often operate on the amount of users a platform has, so HN is unlikely to make the cut. Nobody cares about this site.
hobom
·8 か月前·議論
Jonathan Haidt, the most prominent psychologist pushing for restrictions on social media use for children, is also the most prominent proponent of letting kids play and roam more freely. So no, those are not the same people.
hobom
·9 か月前·議論
What a fantastic way to write a post mortem, pedagogically very useful.
hobom
·3 年前·議論
Comparing against 1990 is wrong though, as we should compare against the start of widespread social media use (2010 at least), and it's also pretty likely that other OECD countries are lagging behind with widespread adoption by a few years. If we don't see an increase from 2015 to 2022 THAT would be counterevidence.
hobom
·3 年前·議論
This is not an accurate reading of the Conclusion section. He just sums up what has been observed and does not mention any causal factors. Earlier, he explicitly says that causal factos will be covered by other posts. While he indeed links to another article, he claims at no point in this article that coddling is a factor here.