I am a novice, but I'll do my best to answer. IPFS isn't a replacement for the existing web like many of its predecessors, for the purposes of your question, it really works more like a drop-in shared caching system. The site host doesn't have to participate in IPFS for this to work.
As an example: You host a blog. As an IPFS user, I surf to the blog and store your content in my cache. When another IPFS user attempts to access your blog they may pull directly from my cached version, or from the original host (depending which is fastest). Merkle DAGs are used to hash content for quick locating, to ensure content is up-to-date, and to build a linked line of content over time.
This gets more interesting if there's a widespread service outage. IPFS nodes will continue to serve the most up-to-date version of the web even if the web is fragmented. As new information becomes available it is integrated into the existing cache and then propagated to the rest of the fragments.
I still struggle to understand how this works with databased content, but I do believe IPFS addresses this content.
I've noticed a "know-nothing" strategy recently adopted by blockchain core - basically, the ideas is that community members claim that everyone who isn't part of core development is naive and has no valid position in debating the future of bitcoin. These users speak with pride about leaving social communities because of their ignorance. It reminds me a lot of the Fox news listeners who deride world media as liars.
Here's an example of the proud know-nothingness. The interesting part begins at 17:30. The speaker, Julia Tourianski, makes a fair attack against Mike Hearn for his departure, but then she goes on to point out that developers are faced with low morale because the community doesn't support their work. The conversation then moves to leaving Reddit and other media because "the trolls" (presumably persons who are in favor of a blocksize increase) have taken over.
With billions (and billions) of dollars being poured into this year's election cycle, it makes sense for the string-pullers to dismantle any vestige of true grassroots organizing. It seems like the "real" money would be invested in disrupting organic organization and favoring controlled and curated organization that favors their whim. I just can't get this damn tinfoil cap off my head.
I'm going to offer a wild suggestion - What if reddit is being purposefully dismantled to break up the social hive it represents? Is it possible that current events are he fruition of a purposeful strategy?
Hello! I believe you are more valuable as a person than the contributions you make through a job. Many people find their self worth through employment, but when you get down to the nuts and bolts of it, employment generally means making money for someone else. This concept of economic slavery causes people who don't fit into the job market to feel like they're not worth their weight.
Your value as a person doesn't have to be defined by your employment. If you open your mind you can find your value as a listener, a thinker, a gardener... whatever.
I'd like to believe that a phone operator at that level would not have clearance to see that type of information on a whim. I'm not saying its impossible, but if it were that available the Snowden revelations would have occurred much sooner.
Most therapy would begin by helping you to recognize the observable events that cause you to escalate your anger and teach you strategies to reroute the course of events in a new direction. For example, I recognize that I am becoming angry when my ears feel hot. I can short circuit that process by deep breathing, counting down from 10, and thinking of someone I care deeply for. Its also important to change your environment when you detect your fuse shortening.
As an example: You host a blog. As an IPFS user, I surf to the blog and store your content in my cache. When another IPFS user attempts to access your blog they may pull directly from my cached version, or from the original host (depending which is fastest). Merkle DAGs are used to hash content for quick locating, to ensure content is up-to-date, and to build a linked line of content over time.
This gets more interesting if there's a widespread service outage. IPFS nodes will continue to serve the most up-to-date version of the web even if the web is fragmented. As new information becomes available it is integrated into the existing cache and then propagated to the rest of the fragments.
I still struggle to understand how this works with databased content, but I do believe IPFS addresses this content.